SAP實施專案上的內部顧問與外部顧問,相互為難還是相互成就?【英文版】
Will internal consultants and external consultants in SAP implementation projects mutual embarrass or mutual success?
In SAP implementation projects, it is normal for Party A's internal consultants to work with Party B's external consultants. During the implementation of the project, it is inevitable that there will be some differences of views or opinions between the internal consultants of Party A and the external consultants of Party B. Both internal consultants and external consultants are SAP peers. The relationship between SAP peers is very delicate. There has been a saying in China since ancient times that "scholars despise each other", and SAP consultants may also despise each other based on different experiences and perceptions among SAP peers. SAP consultants are high-end crowd, and their starting point is high. Their educational level and professional level are also high. It is normal that they are not easily convinced of each other.
Different SAP project implementation modes lead to different relationships between internal and external consultants. After the implementation of an SAP project, internal and external consultants of SAP may become comrades in arms who appreciate each other, or acquaintance who will never contact after the project is end.
1. SAP implementation project led by external consultants. Although many enterprises have internal consultants, when implementing SAP projects, the internal consultants are not deeply involved. In this case, the project team composed of external consultants leads the whole implementation process. During the implementation of the SAP project, the internal consultants either do not participate at all or are auxiliary. They only participate in the discussion but do not play a decisive role in the business blueprint or solution design. This is the situation I often encounter. The detached attitude of internal consultants can give external consultants full play and performance space, and the harmonious working relationship between internal and external consultants can be maintained. Of course, in such implementation projects, the external consultants have relatively heavy tasks, pressure and responsibilities, and are fully responsible for the success of the project implementation. In this mode, the internal and external consultants do not have a deep intersection of work, there is no conflict basically, and they may become good friends.
2. SAP implementation project led by internal consultants. Some multinational enterprises have their own strong internal consulting teams, which play a leading role in the project of overseas factories to rollout the global templates. The determination of project implementation scope, implementation cycle, business process definition and core solution design are all led and completed by the internal consulting team of the headquarters. The external implementation consultant team is in a supporting position. They can only complete the tasks assigned by the internal consultant according to the determined project plan. Under this mode, the internal consultants are absolutely authoritative and can not be challenged. The external consultants are also relaxed. They don't make decisions and don't have to worry too much about the solution design. They just need to complete their work tasks on time. In this mode, the internal and external consultants have a deep intersection of work, but there will be no conflict. They see each other as friends who can help each other and may continue to cooperate in the future.
3. The most difficult relationship between internal and external SAP consultants is the project implementation mode between 1 and 2 above. Although the external consultants lead the implementation of SAP project, the internal consultants are deeply involved in everything. When meeting to discuss the solution or process, they always see that the external consultants are not pleasing to the eye and think that the external consultants are fooling around, so they always put forward different opinions. In fact, it is normal for internal consultants to do so. After all, on behalf of Party A, internal consultants need to find out the risks in the process of project implementation in time, safeguard the interests of the affiliated enterprise, and reflect his personal value, personal ability and personal profession in the process of project implementation. External consultants are also uncomfortable when they encounter internal consultants who are like excrement stirring stick. Quarrels are inevitable. Of course, in most case, external consultants may need to accept the opinions of internal consultants. In the process of SAP project implementation, the solution cannot be finalized as schedule due to the deep involvement or embarrassment of internal consultants, which leads to the increase of external consultants' work tasks and the overtime of external consultants. Of course, if internal consultants toss or embarrass external consultants, it may also be an improvement and promotion for external consultants. Due to the need to fix the internal consultants, the external consultants need to spend more time and energy to design better technical solution or need to do in-depth research on multiple alternative solutions to figure out the advantages and disadvantages of each solution. Although these processes are somewhat tangled and painful, they will undoubtedly improve the professional skills of external consultants. Anyway I naturally have no good feelings for those SAP internal consultants who like to be excrement stirring stick. Although they are my peers, I will only stay away from them. After the SAP project ended, I will basically never contact them again.
During SAP project implementation, do internal consultants and external consultants mutually success or embarrass? This is a matter of different opinions. Mutual embarrassment maybe can realize mutual success. The process of mutual success may be the process of mutual embarrassment. Internal consultants and external consultants on the same project must understand that they are actually on the same boat, and their work objectives are actually the same: to ensure the successful go-live of SAP implementation project! As long as it is for the same purpose, the so-called disagreement, the so-called conflict and tossing are normal and floating clouds.
Written on June 23, 2022.
來自 “ ITPUB部落格 ” ,連結:http://blog.itpub.net/69946223/viewspace-2902525/,如需轉載,請註明出處,否則將追究法律責任。
相關文章
- SAP實施專案上的內部顧問與外部顧問,相互為難還是相互成就?
- 實施顧問眼中的專案實施(轉)
- SAP MM 顧問在實施專案工作中的苦逼和優勢
- 實施顧問與企業專案成員的“親密關係”(轉)
- 從SAP顧問猝死事件談顧問加班事件
- 考核ERP專案實施諮詢顧問是否合格(轉)
- ERP實施顧問面試技巧面試
- SAP顧問如何在GLOBAL 專案中快速提升自己?
- SAP 顧問交流群
- 專案化管理顧問服務
- 淺談ERP實施顧問的工作重點
- SAP顧問的人脈比技術更為重要
- 也談SAP業務顧問如何避免被ABAP開發顧問怒打
- 零售行業SAP專案 --- SAP顧問向大資料轉型的契機行業大資料
- 如何實施BPM?精益生產管理顧問分析如下
- JAVASCRIPT C# 相互訪問JavaScriptC#
- PDS Wuhan專案趣事之拖鞋顧問團隊
- 懸賞高階專案製造顧問解答
- ERP軟體實施顧問的三大核心素質(轉)
- SAP諮詢顧問如何掌握核心技術?
- 關於專案經理/IT顧問的兩則笑話
- 關於QT的標頭檔案相互包含的問題QT
- 軟體專案實施為何難成功(轉)
- 諮詢顧問:面對註定失敗的專案 (轉)
- 諮詢顧問:面對註定失敗的專案(轉)
- DDD專案現在實施的問題
- 精益管理顧問是做什麼的工作?
- OpenStack外部網路不能訪問內部VM
- 作為顧問在各階段的任務
- java 字串與檔案相互轉換Java字串
- 話裡話外:從純技術顧問到業務諮詢顧問的能力發展路徑(上) 薦
- erp專案實施難薦
- 打包時出現相互依賴的問題(即倆個包相互咬死的情況)
- 也談平臺對於SAP顧問個人價值的作用
- C#中byte[] 與string相互轉化問題C#
- MM顧問的常見面試問題(ZZ)面試
- 塊級元素與內聯元素相互轉換
- 有關顧問為誰服務的一點思考