New allowAnyone Bug Identified in Multiple ERC20 Smart Contracts (CVE-2018-11397, CVE-2018-11398)
Our vulnerability-scanning system at PeckShield has so far discovered several dangerous smart contract vulnerabilities ( batchOverflow[1], proxyOverflow[2], transferFlaw[3], ownerAnyone[4],multiOverflow[5]), burnOverflow[6]), ceoAnyone[7]). Some of them could be used by attackers to generate tokens out of nowhere or steal tokens from legitimate holders, while others can be used to take over the ownership from legitimate contract owner (or administrator).
Today, our system reports a new vulnerability called allowAnyone that affects a number of publicly tradable tokens (including EDU). Because of the vulnerability, attackers can steal valuable tokens (managed by affected, vulnerable smart contracts) from legitimate holders. More specifically, our investigation shows that in those vulnerable smart contracts, the ERC20 standard API,transferFrom(), has an issue when checking the allowed[ ][ ] storage, which typically represents the amount of tokens that _from allows msg.sender to use. As a result, anyone can transfer tokens on behalf of another one who has non-zero balance.
In a safe transferFrom implementation, checking the allowance is essential and is typically the case in a number of reference ERC20 transferFrom() implementation. (Otherwise, it would be a stealFrom() implementation!) On the other hand, SafeMath again proves itself as a solid library since it can even cover the missed allowance check logic in this case. As always, make sure you use it in all smart contracts that have arithmetic operations!
We have notified a number of affected development teams and a few major cryptocurrency exchanges have taken preventative actions to suspend relevant deposit and withdrawal operations. In the meantime, we closely monitor latest development. Affected development teams are strongly encouraged to contract us and we are willing to offer any necessary help!
相關文章
- New multiOverflow Bug Identified in Multiple ERC20 Smart Contracts (CVE-2018-10706)IDE
- New burnOverflow Bug Identified in Multiple ERC20 Smart Contracts (CVE-2018-11239)IDE
- New ceoAnyone Bug Identified in Multiple Crypto Game Smart Contracts (CVE-2018-11329)IDEGAM
- New proxyOverflow Bug in Multiple ERC20 Smart Contracts (CVE-2018-10376)
- New evilReflex Bug Identified in Multiple ERC20 Smart Contracts (CVE-2018-12702, CVE-2018-12703)FlexIDE
- ALERT: New batchOverflow Bug in Multiple ERC20 Smart Contracts (CVE-2018-10299)BAT
- New ownerAnyone Bug Allows For Anyone to ''Own'' Certain ERC20-Based Smart Contracts (CVE-2018-10705AI
- SMART goals - SMART objectivesGoObject
- CVE-2018-10944: Vulnerability of ROC(aka Rasputin Online Coin) smart contract (Ethereum ERC20 token)
- Smart Clientclient
- Multiple Regression
- CodeForces 908B New Year and Buggy Bot
- create database link中的identified by valuesDatabaseIDE
- [BUG反饋]onethink 登陸時呼叫$User = new UserApi; 報錯。API
- oracle 9i wrap加密,需要指定edubug=wrap_new_sqlOracle加密SQL
- SMART Goal SettingGo
- JavaScript select multipleJavaScript
- Small Multiple(最短路)
- DataGridView with multiple tableView
- Multiple Buffer Pools (83)
- Multiple Block Sizes (53)BloC
- openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Counters.sol" not found
- New start new hope!
- 重構smart-importImport
- Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For SmartFramework
- Smart Value Help 總結
- 6.7.Propel-smart,easyobjectpersistenceObject
- Laravel 原始碼閱讀指南 -- Contracts 契約Laravel原始碼
- 對話#28:Contracts, Promises, and Mere Semantics (轉)Promise
- 2.3.6.2 Synchronization of Multiple ApplicationsAPP
- Multiple Books多賬薄
- Multiple Render Targets in OpenGL with Cg
- MySql multiple servers on linuxMySqlServerLinux
- ssis multiple table to one file
- maven Multiple sourceDirectory外掛Maven
- Using Multiple Tablespaces (46)
- LLM multiple modal applicationsAPP
- new self()與new static()