對美國政府電子安全官員宣稱的所謂“GOVnet”安全網路分析 (轉)
對美國政府電子安全官員宣稱的所謂“GOVnet”安全網路分析 (轉)[@more@]原始地址: /docs/govnet.htm" target=_blank>
對美國政府電子官員宣稱的所謂“GOVnet”安全分析
中文部分由 阿新(Seraph Chutium) 補充
這裡是華盛頓郵報對的相關報導。
鑑於上篇文章大家因為英文就沒仔細看,我把我理解的大意寫上……
是美國政府的新任電子資訊保安官員稱他們要為美國政府構建一個能夠抵擋任何,恐怖分子以及、的GOVnet網路。他們在做決定前想向業內認識詢問了構建這樣一個網路的花費及難度等等,業內的大部分安全專家認為這向計劃很難完成。其中還有一段介紹了前不久白宮遭紅色程式碼等攻擊的例子:
This year, the current network has been breached by ers, computer worms and viruses. In April, government sites were manipulated
by Chinese hackers angered by the death of a Chinese pilot in a collision with an American spy plane. 這段話看了比較欣慰!
The system was also roughed up by the "Code Red" computer woand an attack program called "ILoveYou." The viruses affected thousands of government computers.(先貼到這裡,大家先看看)。
文章的後面 Kurtz 說即使有這樣的網路,攻擊或病毒仍然可以透過和可信任的內部中傳播。一位現在美國國防部的資訊保安專案主管(information-security program director at the Defense Department 不知道是不是這個意思)說,要想在internet上完全阻止一個豐富的駭客或者設計精巧的病毒是幾乎不可能的。
大意就是這樣……
U.S. Seeks to Build Secure Online Network
TeleFirms Asked for Help in Constructing Private 'Govnet' System
By Krissah Williams
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, October 11, 2001; Page A10
The government's new cyber-security officials yesterday asked telecommunications companies for help building a government computer network that would have "no risk of outs penetration" -- a task some computer security consultants say is nearly impossible.
Plans for the private network, called Govnet, hinge on whether a reliable network infrastructure can be built at an affordable price, officials said. Computer system consultants said they could not estimate how much the network would cost because of the government's enormous size and security needs.
Richard Clarke, who was appointed special adviser to the president for cyberspace security this week, said he believes a more reliable system can be built. Ninety percent of available fiber-optic space is unused and fairly inexpensive to obtain, he said.
Govnet is part of a plan Clarke announced earlier this week "to secure our cyberspace from a range of possible threats, from hackers to criminals to terrorist groups, to foreign nations, which might use cyber-war against us in the future." Govnet would be completely independent from the Internet to help keep out hackers and viruses, according to the government's plan.
The request from the General Services Administration asks that telecommunications companies submit proposals about how the network could be built, how much it would cost, and how long it would take to construct.
"Based upon that we will make a decision. We're waiting to hear from industry right now," Clarke said.
This year, the current network has been breached by hackers, computer worms and viruses. In April, government Web sites were manipulated by Chinese hackers angered by the death of a Chinese pilot in a collision with an American spy plane. The system was also roughed up by the "Code Red" computer worm and an attack program called "ILoveYou." The viruses affected thousands of government computers.
Last year a report by the General Accounting , an internal government watchdog, found weaknesses in the computer network that could allow terrorists or hackers to "severly damage or disrupt national defense or vital public operations or steal sensitive data."
Clarke said the government's current virtual private network is vulnerable to viruses and denial of service attacks that Govnet would make more difficult to execute.
George Kurtz, co-author of "Hacking Exposed" and chief executive of security consulting firm Foundstone Inc., said such a network is feasible but would be costly and difficult to build. It is impossible to stave off all attacks, he said.
"The gist of this entire effort is to try to segment critical government computer systems from the rest of the Internet," Kurtz said. "You can't guarantee against these sort of attacks. There is always going to be a flaw with software, a flaw with hardware or the human element."
Even on Govnet, viruses and attacks could still be spread by floppy disks or connections with trusted systems, Kurtz said.
An internal network, such as the Govnet proposal, is worth investigating but will probably fall to sophisticated hackers, said Amit Yoran, chief executive of security-services company Riptech Inc. and a former information-security program director at the Defense Department.
"It is probably more feasible to implement and strongly enforce global security postures and practices rather than go out and purchase new assets," Yoran said. "Once someone is able to get in, they will find a weak link. When you have a network the size of the government's there will be weak links. Someone will get in."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
下面是名為"m4chine"的fucktelus.com組織成員寫的一份深入分析。
主要介紹了它的目的、由來、撥號碼字首和最後作者做出的結論。
至於那個“News Article Pertaining to GOVnet”就是上面那篇華盛頓郵報的文章。
==> 'An Insightful Look at the GOVnet Network' <==
==> By: m4chine
==> Date: 10/12/01
==> E-: m4chine@fucktelus.com
-
Description
indeX =>
-> Introduction
-> GOVnet's Purpose
-> GOVnet's Origin
-> Dial-In Prefixes
-> News Article Pertaining to GOVnet
-> Conclusion
<=>
Introduction -
GOVnet is the name given to the network infrastructure which serves government offices in
Montpelier and Waterbury as well as district offices in twelve cities and towns statewide. In
the near future the Whitehouse and the DOD will be adopting this network for nation-wide usage.
The physical backbone consists of fiber optic cable connecting state buildings on the Montpelier
and Waterbury campuses as well as high-bandwidth digital circuits connecting district offices
statewide. The wide-area backbone is divided into OSPF regions with at least one alternative
route for each link. From the backbone nodes, 56 Kbps backfeeds serve other government offices,
schools, and libraries statewide.
In addition there are dial-in sites located in every local calling area of the state facilitating
network access with a local phone call from any school or library in the state that elects to have
dial-in access. SLand PPP access, as well as VT100 access, are supported on a dial-in basis.
The network uses the "open" non-proprietary communications protocol which pets connectivity
throughout the state, the nation and the world.
Network services include Internet access, government-wide , and WWW access to government.
--
GOVnet's Purpose -
GOVnet was implemented to meet the twofold network challenge of improved access with reduced costs.
The network provides for complete inter-agency and inter-departmental information access through a single
system serving all agencies on a cerative basis. This eliminates the need for each agency or department
to provide redundant networks involving duplicate costs.
--
GOVnet's Origin -
The Vermont Information Strategy Plan (VISP) identified the requirement for information sharing and
networking in two of the critical success factors associated with its ives. The Information Systems
Advisory Council (ISAC), which was created by VISP (now called IRMAC), was commissioned by the Telecommun-
ication Ten-Year Plan to form a network subcommittee to "develop a plan to integrate network services where
such sharing is valuable for information sharing among government agencies (and) where it is designed and
implemented with the participation and unanimous approval of ISAC."
For a detailed analysis of GOVnet, including a chronology, see the Legislative Joint Fiscal Office's GOVnet.
--
Dial-In Prefixes -
The list below shows the local dial-in site(s) serving each telephone in the State.
For the telephone number of a specific GOVnet dial-in site, wardial the motherfuckin' prefix
or social engineer the technology coordinator of the department.
Dial-In Sites by Telephone Exchange Telephone Exchange Dial-In Site(s):
222 (Bradford) Bradford
223 (Montpelier) Montpelier, Morrisville
226 (Proctor) field
228 (Ludlow) South Londonderry
229 (Montpelier) Montpelier, Morrisville
234 (Bethel) Randolph, Rutland, Woodstock
235 (Middle Town Springs) Rutland, Wells
241, 244 (Waterbury) Montpelier
247 (Brandon) Middlebury, Rutland
253 (Stowe) Montpelier, Morrisville
254, 257, 258 (Brattleboro) Brattleboro
259 (Mount Holly) Rutland, South Londonderry
263 (Perkinsville) Springfield
265 (Fair Haven) Rutland
266 (Canaan) Canaan
273 (Hubbardton) Rutland
276 (Brookfield) Montpelier, Randolph
277 (Lemington) Canaan
285 (Franklin) St. Albans
287 (Poultney) Rutland, Wells
291 (White River Junction) White River Junction, Woodstock
293 (Danby) Rutland, South Londonderry
295, 296 (White River Junction) White River Junction, Woodstock
325 (Pawlet) Rutland, Wells
326 (Montgomery) St. Albans
328 (Guildhall) Island Pond
333 (Fairlee) Bradford
334 (Newport) Newport
348 (Williamsville) Brattleboro
352 (Salisbury) Middlebury
362 (Manchester) Bennington, South Londonderry
365 (Newfane) Brattleboro
368 (Jacksonville) Brattleboro
371 (Montpelier) Montpelier, Morrisville
372 (Grand Isle) Burlington, St. Albans
375 (Arlington) Bennington, Londonderry
387 (Putney) Brattleboro
388 (Middlebury) Middlebury
394 (Rupert) Bennington, Wells
422 (Sherburne) Rutland, Woodstock
423 (Readsboro) Bennington
425 (Charlotte) Burlington
426 (Marshfield) Montpelier
429 (West Newbury) Bradford
433 (Williamstown) Montpelier, Randolph
434 (Richmond) Burlington
436 (Hartland) White River Junction, Woodstock
438 (West Rutland) Rutland
439 (East Corinth) Bradford
442 (Bennington) Bennington
446 (Wallingford) Rutland
447 (Bennington) Bennington
453 (Bristol) Middlebury
454 (Plainfield) Montpelier
456 (East Calais) Montpelier, Morrisville
457 (Woodstock) White River Junction, Woodstock
459 (Proctor) Rutland
462 (Cornwall) Middlebury
463 (Bellows Falls) Bellows Falls, Springfield
464 (Wilmington) Bennington, Brattleboro
467 (West Burke) Island Pond, St. Johnsbury
468 (Castleton) Rutland
472 (Hardwick) Montpelier, Morrisville, St. Johnsbury
475 (Panton) Middlebury
476, 479 (Barre) Montpelier
482 (Hinesburg) Burlington
483 (Pittord) Rutland
484 (Reading) Woodstock
485 (Northfield) Montpelier, Randolph
492 (Cuttingsville) Rutland
496 (Waitsfield) Middlebury, Montpelier, Randolph
524 (St. Albans) St. Albans
525 (Barton) Island Pond, Newport
527 (St. Albans) St. Albans
533 (Greensboro) Morrisville, St. Johnsbury
537 (Benson) Rutland
545 (Weybridge) Middlebury
546 (Weathersfield) Springfield
563 (Cabot) Montpelier, St. Johnsbury
583 (Waitsfield) Middlebury, Montpelier, Randolph
584 (Groton) Bradford
586 (Craftsbury) Morrisville
586 (Greensboro) Morrisville, St. Johnsbury
592 (Peacham) St. Johnsbury
623 (Whiting) Middlebury
626 (Lyndonville) St. Johnsbury
633 (Barnet) St. Johnsbury
635 (Johnson) Morrisville
644 (Jeffersonville) Morrisville
645 (Wells) Wells
649 (Norwich) White River Junction, Woodstock
651, 654, 655, 656, 657, 658, 660 (Burlington) Burlington
672 (Bridgewater) Woodstock
674 (Windsor) Springfield, White River Junction, Woodstock
676 (Maidstone) Island Pond
684 (Danville) St. Johnsbury
685 (Chelsea) Randolph
694 (Stamford) Bennington
695 (Concord) St. Johnsbury
722 (Westminster) Bellows Falls
723 (Island Pond) Island Pond, Newport
728 (Randolph) Randolph
744 (Troy) Newport
746 (Pittsfield) Rutland
747 (Rutland) Rutland
748, 751 (St. Johnsbury) St. Johnsbury
754 (Orleans) Island Pond, Newport
755 (Albany) Morrisville, Newport
757 (Wells River) St. Johnsbury
758 (Bridport) Middlebury
759 (Addison) Middlebury
763 (South Royalton) Randolph, White River Junction, Woodstock
765 (South Strafford) White River Junction
766 (Derby) Newport
767 (Rochester) Middlebury, Randolph
769 (Essex Junction) Burlington
770, 772, 773, 775 (Rutland) Rutland
785 (Thetford) White River Junction
786 (Rutland) Rutland
796 (Alburg) St. Albans
822 (Island Pond) Island Pond
822 () Canaan, Island Pond
823 (Pownal) Bennington
824 (South Londonderry) South Londonderry
827 (East Fairfield) St. Albans
828 (Montpelier) Montpelier, Morrisville
843 (Grafton) Bellows Falls, South Londonderry
848 (Richford) St. Albans
849 (Fairfax) St. Albans
860, 862, 863, 864 (Burlington) Burlington
866 (Newbury) Bradford
867 (Dorset) Bennington
868 (Swanton) St. Albans
869 (Saxtons River) Bellows Falls, Springfield
871, 872 (Essex Junction) Burlington
873 (Derby Line) Newport
874 (Jamaica) Brattleboro, South Londonderry
875 (Chester) Bellows Falls, Springfield, South Londonderry
877 (Vergennes) Middlebury
878, 879 (Essex Junction) Burlington
883 (Barre) Montpelier
883 (Washington) Montpelier
885, 886 (Springfield) Bellows Falls, Springfield
888 (Morrisville) Montpelier, Morrisville
889 (Tunbridge) Randolph
899 (Underhill) Burlington
892 (Lunenburg) Guildhall
893 (Milton) Burlington, St. Albans
895 (Morgan) Island Pond, Newport
896 (Wardsboro) Bennington, Brattleboro, South Londonderry
897 (Shoreham) Middlebury
928 (Isle La Motte) St. Albans
933 (Enosburg Falls) St. Albans
948 (Orwell) Middlebury
962 (Bloomfield) Island Pond
988 (North Troy) Newport
--
Conclusion -
This is what the US Government gets for publically releasing documentation on the Internet about
their so-called "secret" and "private" network... I know you'll have a few good laughs about that one
(I know I did). Love, Peace, And Afro Grease!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
阿新 - Seraph Chutium
對美國政府電子官員宣稱的所謂“GOVnet”安全分析
中文部分由 阿新(Seraph Chutium) 補充
這裡是華盛頓郵報對的相關報導。
鑑於上篇文章大家因為英文就沒仔細看,我把我理解的大意寫上……
是美國政府的新任電子資訊保安官員稱他們要為美國政府構建一個能夠抵擋任何,恐怖分子以及、的GOVnet網路。他們在做決定前想向業內認識詢問了構建這樣一個網路的花費及難度等等,業內的大部分安全專家認為這向計劃很難完成。其中還有一段介紹了前不久白宮遭紅色程式碼等攻擊的例子:
This year, the current network has been breached by ers, computer worms and viruses. In April, government sites were manipulated
by Chinese hackers angered by the death of a Chinese pilot in a collision with an American spy plane. 這段話看了比較欣慰!
The system was also roughed up by the "Code Red" computer woand an attack program called "ILoveYou." The viruses affected thousands of government computers.(先貼到這裡,大家先看看)。
文章的後面 Kurtz 說即使有這樣的網路,攻擊或病毒仍然可以透過和可信任的內部中傳播。一位現在美國國防部的資訊保安專案主管(information-security program director at the Defense Department 不知道是不是這個意思)說,要想在internet上完全阻止一個豐富的駭客或者設計精巧的病毒是幾乎不可能的。
大意就是這樣……
U.S. Seeks to Build Secure Online Network
TeleFirms Asked for Help in Constructing Private 'Govnet' System
By Krissah Williams
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, October 11, 2001; Page A10
The government's new cyber-security officials yesterday asked telecommunications companies for help building a government computer network that would have "no risk of outs penetration" -- a task some computer security consultants say is nearly impossible.
Plans for the private network, called Govnet, hinge on whether a reliable network infrastructure can be built at an affordable price, officials said. Computer system consultants said they could not estimate how much the network would cost because of the government's enormous size and security needs.
Richard Clarke, who was appointed special adviser to the president for cyberspace security this week, said he believes a more reliable system can be built. Ninety percent of available fiber-optic space is unused and fairly inexpensive to obtain, he said.
Govnet is part of a plan Clarke announced earlier this week "to secure our cyberspace from a range of possible threats, from hackers to criminals to terrorist groups, to foreign nations, which might use cyber-war against us in the future." Govnet would be completely independent from the Internet to help keep out hackers and viruses, according to the government's plan.
The request from the General Services Administration asks that telecommunications companies submit proposals about how the network could be built, how much it would cost, and how long it would take to construct.
"Based upon that we will make a decision. We're waiting to hear from industry right now," Clarke said.
This year, the current network has been breached by hackers, computer worms and viruses. In April, government Web sites were manipulated by Chinese hackers angered by the death of a Chinese pilot in a collision with an American spy plane. The system was also roughed up by the "Code Red" computer worm and an attack program called "ILoveYou." The viruses affected thousands of government computers.
Last year a report by the General Accounting , an internal government watchdog, found weaknesses in the computer network that could allow terrorists or hackers to "severly damage or disrupt national defense or vital public operations or steal sensitive data."
Clarke said the government's current virtual private network is vulnerable to viruses and denial of service attacks that Govnet would make more difficult to execute.
George Kurtz, co-author of "Hacking Exposed" and chief executive of security consulting firm Foundstone Inc., said such a network is feasible but would be costly and difficult to build. It is impossible to stave off all attacks, he said.
"The gist of this entire effort is to try to segment critical government computer systems from the rest of the Internet," Kurtz said. "You can't guarantee against these sort of attacks. There is always going to be a flaw with software, a flaw with hardware or the human element."
Even on Govnet, viruses and attacks could still be spread by floppy disks or connections with trusted systems, Kurtz said.
An internal network, such as the Govnet proposal, is worth investigating but will probably fall to sophisticated hackers, said Amit Yoran, chief executive of security-services company Riptech Inc. and a former information-security program director at the Defense Department.
"It is probably more feasible to implement and strongly enforce global security postures and practices rather than go out and purchase new assets," Yoran said. "Once someone is able to get in, they will find a weak link. When you have a network the size of the government's there will be weak links. Someone will get in."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
下面是名為"m4chine"的fucktelus.com組織成員寫的一份深入分析。
主要介紹了它的目的、由來、撥號碼字首和最後作者做出的結論。
至於那個“News Article Pertaining to GOVnet”就是上面那篇華盛頓郵報的文章。
==> 'An Insightful Look at the GOVnet Network' <==
==> By: m4chine
==> Date: 10/12/01
==> E-: m4chine@fucktelus.com
-
Description
indeX =>
-> Introduction
-> GOVnet's Purpose
-> GOVnet's Origin
-> Dial-In Prefixes
-> News Article Pertaining to GOVnet
-> Conclusion
<=>
Introduction -
GOVnet is the name given to the network infrastructure which serves government offices in
Montpelier and Waterbury as well as district offices in twelve cities and towns statewide. In
the near future the Whitehouse and the DOD will be adopting this network for nation-wide usage.
The physical backbone consists of fiber optic cable connecting state buildings on the Montpelier
and Waterbury campuses as well as high-bandwidth digital circuits connecting district offices
statewide. The wide-area backbone is divided into OSPF regions with at least one alternative
route for each link. From the backbone nodes, 56 Kbps backfeeds serve other government offices,
schools, and libraries statewide.
In addition there are dial-in sites located in every local calling area of the state facilitating
network access with a local phone call from any school or library in the state that elects to have
dial-in access. SLand PPP access, as well as VT100 access, are supported on a dial-in basis.
The network uses the "open" non-proprietary communications protocol which pets connectivity
throughout the state, the nation and the world.
Network services include Internet access, government-wide , and WWW access to government.
--
GOVnet's Purpose -
GOVnet was implemented to meet the twofold network challenge of improved access with reduced costs.
The network provides for complete inter-agency and inter-departmental information access through a single
system serving all agencies on a cerative basis. This eliminates the need for each agency or department
to provide redundant networks involving duplicate costs.
--
GOVnet's Origin -
The Vermont Information Strategy Plan (VISP) identified the requirement for information sharing and
networking in two of the critical success factors associated with its ives. The Information Systems
Advisory Council (ISAC), which was created by VISP (now called IRMAC), was commissioned by the Telecommun-
ication Ten-Year Plan to form a network subcommittee to "develop a plan to integrate network services where
such sharing is valuable for information sharing among government agencies (and) where it is designed and
implemented with the participation and unanimous approval of ISAC."
For a detailed analysis of GOVnet, including a chronology, see the Legislative Joint Fiscal Office's GOVnet.
--
Dial-In Prefixes -
The list below shows the local dial-in site(s) serving each telephone in the State.
For the telephone number of a specific GOVnet dial-in site, wardial the motherfuckin' prefix
or social engineer the technology coordinator of the department.
Dial-In Sites by Telephone Exchange Telephone Exchange Dial-In Site(s):
222 (Bradford) Bradford
223 (Montpelier) Montpelier, Morrisville
226 (Proctor) field
228 (Ludlow) South Londonderry
229 (Montpelier) Montpelier, Morrisville
234 (Bethel) Randolph, Rutland, Woodstock
235 (Middle Town Springs) Rutland, Wells
241, 244 (Waterbury) Montpelier
247 (Brandon) Middlebury, Rutland
253 (Stowe) Montpelier, Morrisville
254, 257, 258 (Brattleboro) Brattleboro
259 (Mount Holly) Rutland, South Londonderry
263 (Perkinsville) Springfield
265 (Fair Haven) Rutland
266 (Canaan) Canaan
273 (Hubbardton) Rutland
276 (Brookfield) Montpelier, Randolph
277 (Lemington) Canaan
285 (Franklin) St. Albans
287 (Poultney) Rutland, Wells
291 (White River Junction) White River Junction, Woodstock
293 (Danby) Rutland, South Londonderry
295, 296 (White River Junction) White River Junction, Woodstock
325 (Pawlet) Rutland, Wells
326 (Montgomery) St. Albans
328 (Guildhall) Island Pond
333 (Fairlee) Bradford
334 (Newport) Newport
348 (Williamsville) Brattleboro
352 (Salisbury) Middlebury
362 (Manchester) Bennington, South Londonderry
365 (Newfane) Brattleboro
368 (Jacksonville) Brattleboro
371 (Montpelier) Montpelier, Morrisville
372 (Grand Isle) Burlington, St. Albans
375 (Arlington) Bennington, Londonderry
387 (Putney) Brattleboro
388 (Middlebury) Middlebury
394 (Rupert) Bennington, Wells
422 (Sherburne) Rutland, Woodstock
423 (Readsboro) Bennington
425 (Charlotte) Burlington
426 (Marshfield) Montpelier
429 (West Newbury) Bradford
433 (Williamstown) Montpelier, Randolph
434 (Richmond) Burlington
436 (Hartland) White River Junction, Woodstock
438 (West Rutland) Rutland
439 (East Corinth) Bradford
442 (Bennington) Bennington
446 (Wallingford) Rutland
447 (Bennington) Bennington
453 (Bristol) Middlebury
454 (Plainfield) Montpelier
456 (East Calais) Montpelier, Morrisville
457 (Woodstock) White River Junction, Woodstock
459 (Proctor) Rutland
462 (Cornwall) Middlebury
463 (Bellows Falls) Bellows Falls, Springfield
464 (Wilmington) Bennington, Brattleboro
467 (West Burke) Island Pond, St. Johnsbury
468 (Castleton) Rutland
472 (Hardwick) Montpelier, Morrisville, St. Johnsbury
475 (Panton) Middlebury
476, 479 (Barre) Montpelier
482 (Hinesburg) Burlington
483 (Pittord) Rutland
484 (Reading) Woodstock
485 (Northfield) Montpelier, Randolph
492 (Cuttingsville) Rutland
496 (Waitsfield) Middlebury, Montpelier, Randolph
524 (St. Albans) St. Albans
525 (Barton) Island Pond, Newport
527 (St. Albans) St. Albans
533 (Greensboro) Morrisville, St. Johnsbury
537 (Benson) Rutland
545 (Weybridge) Middlebury
546 (Weathersfield) Springfield
563 (Cabot) Montpelier, St. Johnsbury
583 (Waitsfield) Middlebury, Montpelier, Randolph
584 (Groton) Bradford
586 (Craftsbury) Morrisville
586 (Greensboro) Morrisville, St. Johnsbury
592 (Peacham) St. Johnsbury
623 (Whiting) Middlebury
626 (Lyndonville) St. Johnsbury
633 (Barnet) St. Johnsbury
635 (Johnson) Morrisville
644 (Jeffersonville) Morrisville
645 (Wells) Wells
649 (Norwich) White River Junction, Woodstock
651, 654, 655, 656, 657, 658, 660 (Burlington) Burlington
672 (Bridgewater) Woodstock
674 (Windsor) Springfield, White River Junction, Woodstock
676 (Maidstone) Island Pond
684 (Danville) St. Johnsbury
685 (Chelsea) Randolph
694 (Stamford) Bennington
695 (Concord) St. Johnsbury
722 (Westminster) Bellows Falls
723 (Island Pond) Island Pond, Newport
728 (Randolph) Randolph
744 (Troy) Newport
746 (Pittsfield) Rutland
747 (Rutland) Rutland
748, 751 (St. Johnsbury) St. Johnsbury
754 (Orleans) Island Pond, Newport
755 (Albany) Morrisville, Newport
757 (Wells River) St. Johnsbury
758 (Bridport) Middlebury
759 (Addison) Middlebury
763 (South Royalton) Randolph, White River Junction, Woodstock
765 (South Strafford) White River Junction
766 (Derby) Newport
767 (Rochester) Middlebury, Randolph
769 (Essex Junction) Burlington
770, 772, 773, 775 (Rutland) Rutland
785 (Thetford) White River Junction
786 (Rutland) Rutland
796 (Alburg) St. Albans
822 (Island Pond) Island Pond
822 () Canaan, Island Pond
823 (Pownal) Bennington
824 (South Londonderry) South Londonderry
827 (East Fairfield) St. Albans
828 (Montpelier) Montpelier, Morrisville
843 (Grafton) Bellows Falls, South Londonderry
848 (Richford) St. Albans
849 (Fairfax) St. Albans
860, 862, 863, 864 (Burlington) Burlington
866 (Newbury) Bradford
867 (Dorset) Bennington
868 (Swanton) St. Albans
869 (Saxtons River) Bellows Falls, Springfield
871, 872 (Essex Junction) Burlington
873 (Derby Line) Newport
874 (Jamaica) Brattleboro, South Londonderry
875 (Chester) Bellows Falls, Springfield, South Londonderry
877 (Vergennes) Middlebury
878, 879 (Essex Junction) Burlington
883 (Barre) Montpelier
883 (Washington) Montpelier
885, 886 (Springfield) Bellows Falls, Springfield
888 (Morrisville) Montpelier, Morrisville
889 (Tunbridge) Randolph
899 (Underhill) Burlington
892 (Lunenburg) Guildhall
893 (Milton) Burlington, St. Albans
895 (Morgan) Island Pond, Newport
896 (Wardsboro) Bennington, Brattleboro, South Londonderry
897 (Shoreham) Middlebury
928 (Isle La Motte) St. Albans
933 (Enosburg Falls) St. Albans
948 (Orwell) Middlebury
962 (Bloomfield) Island Pond
988 (North Troy) Newport
--
Conclusion -
This is what the US Government gets for publically releasing documentation on the Internet about
their so-called "secret" and "private" network... I know you'll have a few good laughs about that one
(I know I did). Love, Peace, And Afro Grease!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
阿新 - Seraph Chutium
來自 “ ITPUB部落格 ” ,連結:http://blog.itpub.net/10752043/viewspace-990742/,如需轉載,請註明出處,否則將追究法律責任。
相關文章
- 前美國政府網路安全總管當選ICANN總裁
- 國家網路安全宣傳週 | 科普:網路安全是什麼
- 美創科技全面亮相2020年國家網路安全宣傳週
- 美國國會聽證會:國土安全域性官員稱區塊鏈用例‘無可限量’區塊鏈
- ISC2:人員不足阻礙了美國各州的網路安全工作
- 美國遭遇網路攻擊,對中國物聯網安全有何警示?
- 網際網路對業務轉型的安全影響
- 打call~2020年國家網路安全宣傳週
- 網路安全宣傳週來了,網路安全防線怎麼築?
- 【網路安全分享】移動網際網路所面臨的安全威脅有哪些?
- 政府、醫療資料安全「專精」廠商,美創再登《2023中國網路安全產業勢能榜》產業
- webroot:調查顯示88%的美國人對網路安全過於自信Web
- 拜登政府《改善國家網路安全行政令》簡析
- 守護“人民的網路”的安全銳捷網路助力廣西羅城電子政務安全落實
- 英國NCSC針對供應鏈安全釋出新的網路安全指南
- 安全快報 | 美國國土安全部負責人表示,海事部門缺乏網路安全
- NEC加入美國國土安全域性AIS網路威脅資訊官民共享體系AI
- 築牢網路安全,聯瑞電子為您的資訊傳輸系“安全帶”
- 國家網路安全周 | 美創科技榮獲CCIA網路安全產品雙料大獎
- 第三屆國家網路安全宣傳週今起開幕
- 打卡,福建省2019年國家網路安全宣傳週
- 2017年國家網路安全宣傳週在滬開幕
- 美媒:美政府正在對騰訊的遊戲投資展開“安全審查”遊戲
- 美網路安全主管:各國都是黑客受害者黑客
- 韓國政府宣佈:被檢查的21家加密貨幣交易所中有11家已實施安全措施加密
- 美國能源部:2022美國製造業網路安全路線圖
- 雲原生愛好者週刊:美國國家安全域性釋出網路安全指南
- 2021國家網路安全宣傳週網路安全博覽會今日開幕,綠盟科技亮點搶“鮮”看
- 網路安全宣傳週 | 電信日奉上運營商資料安全三大場景化方案
- 美國實施代號“愛因斯坦”的網路安全工程
- 國家網路安全宣傳週網路安全產業創新發展論壇 | 綠盟科技:5G MEC安全能力需要多方共建產業
- 重磅官宣|2022 CCS成都網路安全大會定檔——雲上安全新形態,擁抱數字新未來
- 正式官宣! | 2021 CCS成都網路安全大會將於八月在成都舉辦
- 天津,我們來了丨2019年國家網路安全宣傳週
- 寶付開展2021年國家網路安全宣傳週活動
- 英國電信建成幾乎“不可破解”的量子安全網路
- 亞洲誠信帶你玩轉[2018國家網路安全宣傳週]上海地區活動!
- 領跑資料安全 | 美創科技入選《中國網路安全企業100強》
- 享安全,中國網路安全意識教育品牌