實驗十六——————動態路由OSPF基礎
實驗內容
1、利用OSPF動態路由協議完成各個子網網路之間的互聯通訊
2、利用OSPF動態路由協議完成不同自治域之間的互聯通訊
實驗目的
- 瞭解OSPF基本配置
- 學會識別OSPF路由
實驗步驟
1、利用OSPF動態路由協議完成各個子網網路之間的互聯通訊
網路拓撲
PC主機的IP地址:192.16.1.1 閘道器地址:172.16.1.254
路由器地址根據實驗圖進行配置此處不再複述。
路由器其他配置
R1:
R2:
R3:
測試
使用pc1分別測試172.16.1.0、192.168.12.0、192.168.23.0、172.16.32.1、 172.16.33.1、172.16.34.1六個子網
PC>ipconfig
FastEthernet0 Connection:(default port)
Link-local IPv6 Address.........: FE80::260:2FFF:FE36:1CCB
IP Address......................: 172.16.1.1
Subnet Mask.....................: 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway.................: 172.16.1.254
PC>ping 172.16.1.254
Pinging 172.16.1.254 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 172.16.1.254: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 172.16.1.254: bytes=32 time=0ms TTL=255
Reply from 172.16.1.254: bytes=32 time=0ms TTL=255
Reply from 172.16.1.254: bytes=32 time=0ms TTL=255
Ping statistics for 172.16.1.254:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 0ms
PC>ping 192.168.12.1
Pinging 192.168.12.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.12.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.12.1: bytes=32 time=0ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.12.1: bytes=32 time=0ms TTL=255
Reply from 192.168.12.1: bytes=32 time=0ms TTL=255
Ping statistics for 192.168.12.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 0ms
PC>ping 192.168.12.2
Pinging 192.168.12.2 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.12.2: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.12.2: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.12.2: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.12.2: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=254
Ping statistics for 192.168.12.2:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 8ms, Average = 4ms
PC>ping 192.168.23.2
Pinging 192.168.23.2 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.23.2: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.23.2: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.23.2: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.23.2: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=254
Ping statistics for 192.168.23.2:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 6ms, Average = 4ms
PC>ping 192.168.23.3
Pinging 192.168.23.3 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.23.3: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=253
Reply from 192.168.23.3: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=253
Reply from 192.168.23.3: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=253
Reply from 192.168.23.3: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Ping statistics for 192.168.23.3:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 12ms, Average = 5ms
PC>ping 172.16.32.1
Pinging 172.16.32.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 172.16.32.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 172.16.32.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=253
Reply from 172.16.32.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 172.16.32.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=253
Ping statistics for 172.16.32.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 7ms, Average = 4ms
PC>ping 172.16.33.1
Pinging 172.16.33.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 172.16.33.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=253
Reply from 172.16.33.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 172.16.33.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=253
Reply from 172.16.33.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=253
Ping statistics for 172.16.33.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 6ms, Average = 3ms
PC>ping 172.16.34.1
Pinging 172.16.34.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 172.16.34.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 172.16.34.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=253
Reply from 172.16.34.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=253
Reply from 172.16.34.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=253
Ping statistics for 172.16.34.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 11ms, Average = 5ms
PC>
實驗的第一部分到此結束,下面開始實驗的第二部分
利用OSPF動態路由協議完成不同自治域之間的互聯通訊
路由器配置(在實驗一的基礎之上進行設定,根據實驗要求可以釋出只需要修改R1\R2即可):
R1
R2
測試:
結論:實現了不同自治域之間的互聯通訊。
相關文章
- 指南:動態路由協議OSPF基礎,OSPF報文,LSA路由協議
- 帶你瞭解動態路由協議OSPF基礎路由協議
- HCNA Routing&Switching之動態路由協議OSPF基礎(二)路由協議
- 動態路由 - OSPF 一文詳解路由
- 八、路由詳細介紹之動態路由OSPF(重點)路由
- 配置rip動態路由實驗路由
- 實驗十五————動態路由協議RIP路由協議
- 實驗5.OSPF配置實驗
- 靜態路由綜合實驗路由
- OSPF介紹及基礎配置
- HCNA Routing&Switching之動態路由協議OSPF DR和BDR路由協議
- 計算機網路實驗二:動態路由配置計算機網路路由
- 實驗3.直連靜態路由實驗路由
- 實驗六——————OSPF協議配置協議
- 基礎實驗
- 路由器基礎介紹,及配置靜態路由,預設路由路由器
- Angular路由——路由基礎Angular路由
- HCNA Routing&Switching之動態路由協議OSPF建立鄰居的條件路由協議
- 靜態路由和動態路由路由
- OSPF路由 與 ISIS路由 與路由學習對比路由
- 實驗4.浮動路由路由
- 動態SQL開發基礎和經驗再總結SQL
- 思科與H3C配置命令對比 靜態路由&OSPF路由
- swift基礎學習(十六)Swift
- eNSP華為路由器OSPF配置----OSPF和RIP互相通訊路由器
- OSPF 路由協議詳解(一)路由協議
- React路由(基礎)React路由
- Vue 配合eiement動態路由,許可權驗證Vue路由
- 【動態規劃(一)】動態規劃基礎動態規劃
- 動態效能檢視基礎
- Flask動態路由Flask路由
- 實驗十四——————IP地址劃分和靜態路由路由
- 靜態路由和動態路由的比較路由
- 移動端基於動態路由的架構設計路由架構
- [pwn基礎]動態連結原理
- MyBatis基礎:MyBatis動態SQL(3)MyBatisSQL
- Vue之動態路由、巢狀路由Vue路由巢狀
- Flask(5)- 動態路由Flask路由