Archive Log模式下Redo Log、Check Point和Switch Log
在Oracle體系中,Online Redo Log、Archived Redo Log、Check Point和Switch Log動作之間是存在著千絲萬縷的關係。作為我們非理論研究者而言,過多的強調技術細節意義不是很大。但是在實際中,進行診斷和問題解決的時候,對原理的理解還是有一定的作用的。
本篇從兩個場景入手,研究一下Redo Log切換過程中,check point和相關狀態情況。
1、實驗環境介紹
本篇實驗在Oracle 11R2上進行測試。
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.1.0 Production
當前為歸檔archive模式,三個日誌組。
SQL> select log_mode from v$database;
LOG_MODE
------------
ARCHIVELOG
SQL> select group#, sequence#, archived, status, first_change# from v$log;
GROUP# SEQUENCE# ARCHIVED STATUS FIRST_CHANGE#
---------- ---------- -------- ---------------- -------------
1 139 YES INACTIVE 3466294
2 140 NO CURRENT 3466703
3 138 YES INACTIVE 3464619
我們透過alter log來監控系統行為。我們可以使用log_checkpoints_to_alert來控制檢查點發出的時候,預設是不寫入到alert_log中。
SQL> show parameter log_checkpoints;
NAME TYPE VALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
log_checkpoints_to_alert boolean FALSE
SQL> alter system set log_checkpoints_to_alert=true;
System altered
SQL> show parameter log_checkpoints;
NAME TYPE VALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
log_checkpoints_to_alert boolean TRUE
2、三種常見的Checkpoint行為
我們經常能夠看到的Checkpoint一共有三種。分別為:全域性檢查點(Global Checkpoint)、增量檢查點(Incremental Checkpoint)和日誌切換檢查點(Switch Log Checkpoint)。
當我們發出alter system checkpoint或者啟動關閉的時候,會有主動檢查點動作。
SQL> alter system checkpoint;
System altered
Sun Aug 04 03:52:53 2013
Beginning global checkpoint up to RBA [0x8c.23a.10], SCN: 3467262
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x8c.23a.10], SCN: 3467262
增量檢查點主要是針對Global Checkpoint所帶來的效能問題而引入的一種最佳化機制。檢查點Check Point引入的目的,是為了保證進行例項恢復(一旦出現Instance Crash)的時候,消耗的時間可以被接受。存在一個Check Point在Redo Log中,相當於是“宣告”了之前的Redo Log Entry對應的Dirty Blocks都已經寫入到了資料檔案中。
增量檢查點是Oracle執行階段中自動進行的。
Sun Aug 04 04:13:13 2013
Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0x99.17.0], current log tail at RBA [0x99.169.0]
兩種檢查點(Global Checkpoint和Incremental Checkpoint)執行都是一次性的,也就是一次性完成,不是一個持續過程。Switch Log Checkpoint在進行Online Redo Log進行切換的時候開始,結束之後一段時間才能結束。
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x8d.2.10], SCN: 3467294
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 141 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 3 seq# 141 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_870n4lsg_.log
Current log# 3 seq# 141 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_870n4o31_.log
Sun Aug 04 03:53:56 2013
Archived Log entry 232 added for thread 1 sequence 140 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Sun Aug 04 03:59:08 2013
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x8d.2.10], SCN: 3467294
從開始到結束,中間持續了若干分鐘,而且這分鐘裡面,資料庫的事務操作沒有結束。這就是第三類Check Point。
下面我們進入正題,研究一下Redo Log切換過程。
3、非覆蓋過程Redo Log切換行為
首先我們先看看Archive Log模式下的時候,日誌非覆蓋的情形。
當前日誌組online為2,為current狀態。其他日誌狀態為Inactive狀態。
SQL> select group#, sequence#, archived, status, first_change# from v$log;
GROUP# SEQUENCE# ARCHIVED STATUS FIRST_CHANGE#
---------- ---------- -------- ---------------- -------------
1 139 YES INACTIVE 3466294
2 140 NO CURRENT 3466703
3 138 YES INACTIVE 3464619
常見的Online Redo Log Group狀態是四個:Active、Inactive、Current和Unusable。當一個日誌組被新加入到系統中,沒有被寫入過的時候,狀態為Unusable。Current狀態表示當前日誌組。Active是說日誌組已經不是當前日誌組,但是Redo Log Entry對應的Dirty Block還沒有完全寫入到資料檔案中。Inactive表示Dirty Block已經完全寫入。
此時,我們切換日誌。
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered
SQL> select group#, sequence#, archived, status, first_change# from v$log;
GROUP# SEQUENCE# ARCHIVED STATUS FIRST_CHANGE#
---------- ---------- -------- ---------------- -------------
1 139 YES INACTIVE 3466294
2 140 YES ACTIVE 3466703
3 141 NO CURRENT 3467294
剛剛的Current日誌狀態變化為Active。表示還沒有完全寫入,此時Alert Log中顯示出剛剛的變化。
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x8d.2.10], SCN: 3467294
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 141 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 3 seq# 141 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_870n4lsg_.log
Current log# 3 seq# 141 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_870n4o31_.log
Sun Aug 04 03:53:56 2013
Archived Log entry 232 added for thread 1 sequence 140 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
此時,立即生成的log記錄中,有開始log switch checkpoint開始的記錄,之後切換日誌。同時,有Archived Log的資訊。
在剛剛的資訊v$log中,我們也的確看到了group 2日誌組Archived Log狀態是Yes,而狀態是Active。這就告訴我們:在Active狀態時候,Oracle Archived是可以進行歸檔的。注意:此時沒有發生切換日誌覆蓋動作。
注意,此時時間是3:53。過一會之後,才結束log switch checkpoint。
[oracle@bspdev ~]$ date
Sun Aug 4 03:54:15 CST 2013
SQL> select to_char(sysdate,'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') from dual;
TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'YYYY-MM-DDHH2
------------------------------
2013-08-04 03:55:18
--延後資訊顯示在日誌上
Sun Aug 04 03:53:56 2013
Archived Log entry 232 added for thread 1 sequence 140 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Sun Aug 04 03:59:08 2013
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x8d.2.10], SCN: 3467294
基本上,接近6分鐘才結束這個過程。日誌組group 2狀態也變為Inactive。
SQL> select group#, sequence#, archived, status, first_change# from v$log;
GROUP# SEQUENCE# ARCHIVED STATUS FIRST_CHANGE#
---------- ---------- -------- ---------------- -------------
1 139 YES INACTIVE 3466294
2 140 YES INACTIVE 3466703
3 141 NO CURRENT 3467294
那麼如果我們由於生成redo log entry的量過大、速度過快,形成切換迴圈到下一個redo log的時候,歸檔或者active尚未完成,是什麼現象呢?我們繼續分析。
4、覆蓋過程Redo Log切換行為
Redo Log切換和歸檔,是Oracle運維和效能調優的一個方面。Redo Log設定不合理,可能會給系統帶來一定的效能問題。
比較常見的問題根源是:日誌設定相對於業務量而言,體積較小,日誌切換速度高。同時,低優先順序DBWR或者ARCH來不及將日誌寫入或者歸檔。從而引起阻塞等待。
我們當前狀態如下:
SQL> set timing on;
SQL> select group#, sequence#, archived, status, first_change# from v$log;
GROUP# SEQUENCE# ARCHIVED STATUS FIRST_CHANGE#
---------- ---------- -------- ---------------- -------------
1 142 YES INACTIVE 3467843
2 143 YES ACTIVE 3467851
3 144 NO CURRENT 3467864
Executed in 0.015 seconds
我們為了模擬情況,使用指令碼連續進行switch log,形成日誌來不及歸檔或者寫入髒塊的情形。
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered
Executed in 0.015 seconds
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered
Executed in 2.262 seconds
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered
Executed in 2.964 seconds
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered
Executed in 0.234 seconds
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered
Executed in 1.139 seconds
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered
Executed in 0.015 seconds
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered
Executed in 0.234 seconds
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered
Executed in 1.731 seconds
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered
Executed in 1.341 seconds
連續的switch log動作,我們從執行時間上,可以看到極度的不平衡。時間最短可以有0.015s,而最長時間達到3s。明顯這個過程中,由於archive和db block寫入,引起一系列的等待或者阻塞。
對應最後的日誌資訊如下:
SQL> select group#, sequence#, archived, status, first_change# from v$log;
GROUP# SEQUENCE# ARCHIVED STATUS FIRST_CHANGE#
---------- ---------- -------- ---------------- -------------
1 151 YES INACTIVE 3467978
2 152 YES INACTIVE 3467981
3 153 NO CURRENT 3467984
Executed in 0.015 seconds
Sequence從144變換到153。這個階段alert log資訊如下:
Sun Aug 04 04:03:14 2013
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x90.2.10], SCN: 3467864
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 144 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 3 seq# 144 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_870n4lsg_.log
Current log# 3 seq# 144 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_870n4o31_.log
Sun Aug 04 04:03:14 2013
Archived Log entry 235 added for thread 1 sequence 143 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Sun Aug 04 04:06:39 2013
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x91.2.10], SCN: 3467958
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 145 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 1 seq# 145 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n42n1_.log
Current log# 1 seq# 145 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n44z3_.log
Sun Aug 04 04:06:39 2013
Archived Log entry 236 added for thread 1 sequence 144 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 146
Checkpoint not complete
Current log# 1 seq# 145 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n42n1_.log
Current log# 1 seq# 145 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n44z3_.log
Sun Aug 04 04:06:42 2013
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x90.2.10], SCN: 3467864
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x92.2.10], SCN: 3467962
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 146 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 2 seq# 146 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_870n48hc_.log
Current log# 2 seq# 146 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_870n4dtl_.log
Sun Aug 04 04:06:42 2013
Archived Log entry 237 added for thread 1 sequence 145 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 147
Checkpoint not complete
Current log# 2 seq# 146 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_870n48hc_.log
Current log# 2 seq# 146 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_870n4dtl_.log
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x92.2.10], SCN: 3467962
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x91.2.10], SCN: 3467958
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x93.2.10], SCN: 3467966
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 147 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 3 seq# 147 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_870n4lsg_.log
Current log# 3 seq# 147 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_870n4o31_.log
Sun Aug 04 04:06:45 2013
Archived Log entry 238 added for thread 1 sequence 146 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x94.2.10], SCN: 3467969
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 148 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 1 seq# 148 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n42n1_.log
Current log# 1 seq# 148 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n44z3_.log
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x94.2.10], SCN: 3467969
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x95.2.10], SCN: 3467972
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 149 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 2 seq# 149 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_870n48hc_.log
Current log# 2 seq# 149 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_870n4dtl_.log
Archived Log entry 239 added for thread 1 sequence 147 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Archived Log entry 240 added for thread 1 sequence 148 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x96.2.10], SCN: 3467975
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 150 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 3 seq# 150 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_870n4lsg_.log
Current log# 3 seq# 150 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_870n4o31_.log
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x96.2.10], SCN: 3467975
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x97.2.10], SCN: 3467978
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 151 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 1 seq# 151 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n42n1_.log
Current log# 1 seq# 151 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n44z3_.log
ORACLE Instance wilson - Can not allocate log, archival required
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 152
All online logs needed archiving
Current log# 1 seq# 151 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n42n1_.log
Current log# 1 seq# 151 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n44z3_.log
Archived Log entry 241 added for thread 1 sequence 149 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x98.2.10], SCN: 3467981
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 152 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 2 seq# 152 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_870n48hc_.log
Current log# 2 seq# 152 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_870n4dtl_.log
Archived Log entry 242 added for thread 1 sequence 150 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Archived Log entry 243 added for thread 1 sequence 151 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 153
Checkpoint not complete
Current log# 2 seq# 152 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_870n48hc_.log
Current log# 2 seq# 152 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_870n4dtl_.log
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x97.2.10], SCN: 3467978
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x95.2.10], SCN: 3467972
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x93.2.10], SCN: 3467966
Sun Aug 04 04:06:50 2013
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x99.2.10], SCN: 3467984
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 153 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 3 seq# 153 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_870n4lsg_.log
Current log# 3 seq# 153 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_870n4o31_.log
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x99.2.10], SCN: 3467984
Archived Log entry 244 added for thread 1 sequence 152 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Sun Aug 04 04:06:53 2013
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x98.2.10], SCN: 3467981
從日誌裡面,我們看到幾個現象:
首先,switch log check point是可以進行巢狀過程的。一個log switch check point沒有結束,可能有一個新的check point開始。
Sun Aug 04 04:03:14 2013
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x90.2.10], SCN: 3467864 –第一個check point動作
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 144 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 3 seq# 144 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_870n4lsg_.log
Current log# 3 seq# 144 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_870n4o31_.log
Sun Aug 04 04:03:14 2013
Archived Log entry 235 added for thread 1 sequence 143 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Sun Aug 04 04:06:39 2013
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x91.2.10], SCN: 3467958 –第二個check point動作開始
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 145 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 1 seq# 145 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n42n1_.log
Current log# 1 seq# 145 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n44z3_.log
Sun Aug 04 04:06:39 2013
Archived Log entry 236 added for thread 1 sequence 144 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 146
Checkpoint not complete
Current log# 1 seq# 145 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n42n1_.log
Current log# 1 seq# 145 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n44z3_.log
Sun Aug 04 04:06:42 2013
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x90.2.10], SCN: 3467864 –第一個check point結束
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x92.2.10], SCN: 3467962
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 146 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 2 seq# 146 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_870n48hc_.log
Current log# 2 seq# 146 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_870n4dtl_.log
Sun Aug 04 04:06:42 2013
Archived Log entry 237 added for thread 1 sequence 145 ID 0xe96e7a48 dest 1:
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 147
Checkpoint not complete
Current log# 2 seq# 146 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_870n48hc_.log
Current log# 2 seq# 146 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_870n4dtl_.log
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x92.2.10], SCN: 3467962 –第三個check point結束
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x91.2.10], SCN: 3467958 –第二個check point結束
第二個是當切換很頻繁的時候,日誌check point會有不能推動等待情況。Alert log中存在check point not complete的時候,對應還常出現“Thread 1 cannot allocate new log”。
如果切換過程中要求覆蓋當前日誌沒有歸檔,Oracle是有等待情況。一旦出現這樣的情況,就說明需要進行歸檔過程的調整。
beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x97.2.10], SCN: 3467978
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 151 (LGWR switch)
Current log# 1 seq# 151 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n42n1_.log
Current log# 1 seq# 151 mem# 1: /u01/flash_recovery_area/WILSON/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_870n44z3_.log
ORACLE Instance wilson - Can not allocate log, archival required
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 152
All online logs needed archiving
我們發現:如果一個日誌要被覆蓋,要保證日誌已經歸檔,並且狀態已經寫入。
5、結論
Check Point、Switch Log和Redo Log是Oracle中比較複雜的問題。網路上很多人經常討論檢查點之類的細節問題,筆者認為:不同版本的oracle在這些方法上有差異,針對效能調優過程,過於細節的內容也沒有太大的意義,沒必要過於糾結。
來自 “ ITPUB部落格 ” ,連結:http://blog.itpub.net/17203031/viewspace-767731/,如需轉載,請註明出處,否則將追究法律責任。
相關文章
- undo log和redo log
- MySQL Undo Log和Redo Log介紹MySql
- MySQL中的redo log和undo logMySql
- MySQL的Redo log 以及Bin logMySql
- 【Mysql】三大日誌 redo log、bin log、undo logMySql
- 深入理解MySQL系列之redo log、undo log和binlogMySql
- log file switch
- mysql之 redo logMySql
- MySQL中的redo log和checkpointMySql
- 基於Redo Log和Undo Log的MySQL崩潰恢復流程MySql
- 什麼叫archive log expired?Hive
- Archive log mining steps(logminer to html)HiveHTML
- log_archive_dest與log_archive_dest_n與USE_DB_RECOVERY_FILE_DESTHive
- mysql日誌:redo log、binlog、undo log 區別與作用MySql
- MySQL中redo log、undo log、binlog關係以及區別MySql
- 硬核乾貨!一文掌握 binlog 、redo log、undo log
- redo log file 最佳化
- MySQL redo log最佳化MySql
- MySQL重做日誌(redo log)MySql
- 必須瞭解的mysql三大日誌-binlog、redo log和undo logMySql
- MySQL error log和bin logMySqlError
- MySQL學習之change buffer 和 redo logMySql
- 3000幀動畫圖解MySQL為什麼需要binlog、redo log和undo log動畫圖解MySql
- InnoDB文件筆記(二)—— Redo Log筆記
- How to Dump Redo Log File Information --metalinkORM
- redo log 和 binlog 的一些總結
- MySQL 日誌系統 redo log、binlogMySql
- MySQL的general_log和slow_logMySql
- 17 LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_n 引數屬性Hive
- Oracle redo解析之-1、oracle redo log結構計算Oracle Redo
- MySQL如何計算統計redo log大小MySql
- 關於log file switch and checkpoint機制
- 2 萬字 + 30 張圖 | 細聊 MySQL undo log、redo log、binlog 有什麼用?MySql
- [20200114]關於log_archive_dest_1設定.txtHive
- [20200219]log_archive_dest_1定義問題.txtHive
- ORA-16024: parameter LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_1 cannot be parsedHive
- Tomcat 中 catalina.out、catalina.log、localhost.log 和 access_log 的區別Tomcatlocalhost
- MySQL Redo log頁內邏輯怎麼理解MySql
- Oracle RAC+DG 調整redo/standby log fileOracle