Adaptive Cursor Sharing(第四篇)
ACS與PL/SQL
前面的章節論述了ACS的特性,我們來看下ACS在PL/SQL裡的工作情況,結果可能會令你非常失望。
首先構造一個PL/SQL,裡面使用到了我們在本章中建立的表T:
SQL>var sql_id varchar2(255) SQL>alter system flush shared_pool;
System altered. 2 x integer; 3 n number; 4 begin 5 for i in 1..10 loop 6 if i = 1 then 7 x := 500000; 8 else 9 x := 1; 10 end if; 11 select count(object_id) into n from t where id > x; 12 end loop; 13 end; 14 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. |
這段PL/SQL首先會執行‘select count(object_id) into n from t where id > 100000 ’1次,然後會執行‘select count(object_id) into n from t where id >1’ 9次,執行完成後,我們來看看是否會使用到ACS。
SQL>select 2 sql_id 3 , child_number 4 , executions 5 , parse_calls 6 , buffer_gets 7 , is_bind_sensitive 8 , is_bind_aware 9 from 10 v$sql 11 where 12 sql_id =' gp03v5aw085v3';
SQL_ID CHILD_NUMBER EXECUTIONS PARSE_CALLS BUFFER_GETS IS IS --------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- ----------- -- -- gp03v5aw085v3 0 10 1 646875 Y N
|
非常可惜,這個SQL並沒有產生多個子遊標,雖然已經識別到這個SQL為繫結敏感is_bind_sensitive='Y',但是is_bind_aware='N'。
SQL> SELECT hash_value, sql_id, child_number, bucket_id, COUNT 2 FROM v$sql_cs_histogram 3 WHERE sql_id='gp03v5aw085v3' 4 ORDER BY sql_id, child_number;
HASH_VALUE SQL_ID CHILD_NUMBER BUCKET_ID COUNT ---------- --------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- 3087275875 gp03v5aw085v3 0 0 1 3087275875 gp03v5aw085v3 0 2 9 3087275875 gp03v5aw085v3 0 1 0 |
雖然v$sql_cs_histogram已經監控到了處理行數的巨大改變,但是卻沒有生成新的遊標。
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SQL_ID gp03v5aw085v3, child number 0 ------------------------------------- SELECT COUNT(OBJECT_ID) FROM T WHERE ID > :B1
Plan hash value: 3694077449
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 4 (100)| | | 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 10 | | | | 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 1 | 10 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I | 1 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peeked Binds (identified by position): --------------------------------------
1 - :B1 (NUMBER): 5000000
Predicate Information (identified by operation id): ---------------------------------------------------
3 - access("ID">:B1) |
執行計劃一直沿用的是第一次產生的執行計劃,根據Peeked Binds (identified by position):的值為5000000可以推斷出來。我們嘗試在SQL裡增加bind_aware hint看看,這個hint的作用在本章的最佳實踐小節中介紹,這裡不再贅述。
SQL>declare 2 x integer; 3 n number; 4 begin 5 for i in 1..10 loop 6 if i = 1 then 7 x := 5000000; 8 else 9 x := 1; 10 end if; 11 select /*+ bind_aware */count(object_id) into n from t where id > x; 12 end loop; 13 end; 14 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>select 2 sql_id 3 , child_number 4 , executions 5 , parse_calls 6 , buffer_gets 7 , is_bind_sensitive 8 , is_bind_aware 9 from 10 v$sql 11 where 12 sql_id = '5542a2rzny69v';
SQL_ID CHILD_NUMBER EXECUTIONS PARSE_CALLS BUFFER_GETS IS IS --------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- ----------- -- -- 5542a2rzny69v 0 10 1 687396 Y Y |
雖然最佳化器已經標記這個遊標is_bind_aware='Y'了,但是依然沒有新的遊標產生出來。在MOS上查詢類似的問題,會發現一個BUG:
Bug 8357294 : ADAPTIVE cursor SHARING DOESN'T WORK FOR STATIC SQL cursorS FROM PL/SQL
標題的意思是由於BUG,ACS不能工作在PL/SQL的靜態遊標裡。但是根據測試動態遊標也不能工作。
SQL>declare 2 x integer; 3 n number; 4 begin 5 for i in 1..10 loop 6 if i = 1 then 7 x := 5000000; 8 else 9 x := 1; 10 end if; 11 execute immediate 12 'select count(object_id) from t where id > :x' into n using x; 13 end loop; 14 end; 15 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>select 2 sql_id 3 , child_number 4 , executions 5 , parse_calls 6 , buffer_gets 7 , is_bind_sensitive 8 , is_bind_aware 9 from 10 v$sql 11 where 12 sql_id = '6qwg6gauwbpm8';
SQL_ID CHILD_NUMBER EXECUTIONS PARSE_CALLS BUFFER_GETS IS IS --------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- ----------- -- -- 6qwg6gauwbpm8 0 10 1 687580 Y N |
文中提到了Session_Cached_Cursors在設定為0後,ACS就可以正常工作了,經過試驗也如它所說。
SQL>alter session set Session_Cached_Cursors=0;
Session altered.
SQL>alter system flush shared_pool;
System altered.
SQL>declare 2 x integer; 3 n number; 4 begin 5 for i in 1..10 loop 6 if i = 1 then 7 x := 5000000; 8 else 9 x := 1; 10 end if; 11 select count(object_id) into n from t where id > x; 12 end loop; 13 end; 14 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>select 2 sql_id 3 , child_number 4 , executions 5 , parse_calls 6 , buffer_gets 7 , is_bind_sensitive 8 , is_bind_aware 9 from 10 v$sql 11 where 12 sql_id = ' gp03v5aw085v3';
SQL_ID CHILD_NUMBER EXECUTIONS PARSE_CALLS BUFFER_GETS IS IS --------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- ----------- -- -- gp03v5aw085v3 0 2 3 76405 Y N gp03v5aw085v3 1 8 7 517480 Y Y
SQL>select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor('gp03v5aw085v3',null));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SQL_ID gp03v5aw085v3, child number 0 ------------------------------------- SELECT COUNT(OBJECT_ID) FROM T WHERE ID > :B1
Plan hash value: 3694077449
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 4 (100)| | | 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 10 | | | | 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 1 | 10 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | |* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I | 1 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id): ---------------------------------------------------
3 - access("ID">:B1)
SQL_ID gp03v5aw085v3, child number 1 ------------------------------------- SELECT COUNT(OBJECT_ID) FROM T WHERE ID > :B1
Plan hash value: 2966233522
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 14373 (100)| | | 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 10 | | | |* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T | 4999K| 47M| 14373 (2)| 00:02:53 | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id): ---------------------------------------------------
2 - filter("ID">:B1)
|
可以看到ACS已經工作了,在v$sql_cs_histogram裡也為新遊標產生了新的行。
SQL> SELECT hash_value, sql_id, child_number, bucket_id, COUNT 2 FROM v$sql_cs_histogram 3 WHERE sql_id='gp03v5aw085v3' 4 ORDER BY sql_id, child_number;
HASH_VALUE SQL_ID CHILD_NUMBER BUCKET_ID COUNT ---------- --------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- 3087275875 gp03v5aw085v3 0 1 0 3087275875 gp03v5aw085v3 0 0 1 3087275875 gp03v5aw085v3 0 2 1 3087275875 gp03v5aw085v3 1 1 0 3087275875 gp03v5aw085v3 1 0 0 3087275875 gp03v5aw085v3 1 2 8 |
來自 “ ITPUB部落格 ” ,連結:http://blog.itpub.net/22034023/viewspace-2153690/,如需轉載,請註明出處,否則將追究法律責任。
相關文章
- Adaptive Cursor Sharing(第五篇)APT
- Adaptive Cursor Sharing(第三篇)APT
- Adaptive Cursor Sharing(第二篇)APT
- Adaptive Cursor Sharing (第一篇)APT
- [20221227]Adaptive Cursor Sharing & 直方圖.txtAPT直方圖
- 11G Adaptive Cursor Sharing(ACS)的研究APT
- Postgresql的CURSOR SHARINGSQL
- [20180803]cursor_sharing = force.txt
- [20202117]Function based indexes and cursor sharing.txtFunctionIndex
- [20210627]cursor_sharing=force與orade by.txt
- ORACLE中Cursor_sharing引數詳解Oracle
- [20220414]Function based indexes and cursor sharing2.txtFunctionIndex
- [20241012]cursor_sharing=force與函式索引.txt函式索引
- 初始化引數遊標之cursor_sharing
- [20201126]使用cursor_sharing_exact與給sql打補丁2.txtSQL
- [20201126]使用cursor_sharing_exact與給sql打補丁3.txtSQL
- Difference between cursor and a ref cursor
- [Vue] Sharing StateVue
- 【CURSOR】Oracle 遊標 (cursor)知識梳理Oracle
- Oracle CursorOracle
- Cursor使用
- Memory-Efficient Adaptive OptimizationAPT
- cursor_sharing=force強制繫結變數不會把變數值預設當成varchar2型別的理解變數型別
- PAT甲級1032 Sharing
- Lean Data Innovation Sharing Salon(2018.09.15)
- firefox css cursor handFirefoxCSS
- Oracle:cursor:mutex XOracleMutex
- iOS Sharing #01 | 2019-03-23iOS
- iOS Sharing #02 | 2019-03-30iOS
- iOS Sharing #03 | 2019-04-06iOS
- SQL Profile(第四篇)SQL
- 第四篇部落格
- CSS滑鼠樣式(cursor)CSS
- cursor pin S wait on XAI
- cursor: pin S wait on XAI
- 提點效: 使用 Cursor
- Security Series: Cross-domain resource sharing CORSROSAICORS
- 哈哈,我好像知道 Cursor 為什麼叫 Cursor 了,真相竟然是。。。