[20181119]sql語句執行緩慢分析.txt
[20181119]sql語句執行緩慢分析.txt
--//上個星期在最佳化時遇到sql語句執行緩慢的問題,百思不知其解,做一個記錄.
--//我們生產系統有一個表索引有點多,肯定一些索引不需要,我想刪除一些不必要的索引(可以先invisiable).再觀察情況.
1.環境:
zzzzzz> @ ver1
PORT_STRING VERSION BANNER
------------------------------ -------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
x86_64/Linux 2.4.xx 11.2.0.3.0 Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
2.執行指令碼如下:
$ cat a.txt
SELECT /*+ &&2 */ owner,
index_name,
-- index_type,
table_NAME,
COMPRESSION,
UNIQUENESS,
distinct_keys,
AVG_LEAF_blocks_per_key,
AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY,
blevel,
leaf_blocks,
clustering_factor,
status,
num_rows,
sample_size,
last_analyzed
FROM dba_indexes
WHERE owner LIKE 'XXXXXX_YYY'
AND table_name = UPPER ('&&1')
AND (owner, index_name) IN (SELECT owner, index_name
FROM dba_indexes
WHERE owner LIKE 'XXXXXX_YYY'
AND index_type <> 'LOB'
MINUS
(SELECT object_owner, object_name
FROM v$sql_plan
WHERE object_type = 'INDEX'
AND object_owner LIKE 'XXXXXX_YYY'
UNION
SELECT object_owner, object_name
FROM dba_hist_sql_plan
WHERE object_type = 'INDEX'
AND object_owner LIKE 'XXXXXX_YYY')
MINUS
(SELECT owner, constraint_name
FROM dba_constraints
WHERE owner LIKE 'XXXXXX_YYY'
AND constraint_type IN ('P',
'U',
'R')));
--//主要目的先排除一些現在使用的索引.
3.執行:
--//session 1:
zzzzzz> alter session set statistics_level=all;
Session altered.
zzzzzz> @ a.txt MS_CF01 aaa
...
--//慢.等。。。。
--//session 1,按ctrl+c中斷執行,實際上沒有執行完成:
zzzzzz> @ dpc '' ''
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
-------------------------------------
SQL_ID frzb5c8tjx9wz, child number 0
...
Plan hash value: 2331593202
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows |E-Bytes| Cost (%CPU)| E-Time | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers | Reads | OMem | 1Mem | Used-Mem |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | | | 485 (100)| | 1 |00:01:42.24 | 2568K| 93 | | | |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 1 | 179 | 145 (0)| 00:00:02 | 1 |00:01:42.24 | 2568K| 93 | | | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 1 | 168 | 144 (0)| 00:00:02 | 1 |00:01:42.24 | 2568K| 93 | | | |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 1 | 165 | 143 (0)| 00:00:02 | 1 |00:01:42.24 | 2568K| 93 | | | |
... 太長...
| 38 | SORT UNIQUE | | 3490 | 1 | 375 | 340 (97)| 00:00:05 | 126 |00:03:18.78 | 4909K| 15 | 2048 | 2048 | |
| 39 | UNION-ALL | | 3490 | | | | | 1461 |00:03:18.73 | 4909K| 15 | | | |
|* 40 | FIXED TABLE FULL | X$KQLFXPL | 3490 | 1 | 22 | 3 (100)| 00:00:01 | 826 |00:02:58.63 | 0 | 0 | | | |
|* 41 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | WRH$_SQL_PLAN | 3489 | 1 | 17 | 308 (1)| 00:00:04 | 635 |00:00:20.08 | 4909K| 15 | | | |
--//很明顯主要慢在ID=40,41,而實際上主要是迴圈次數3490導致執行緩慢.
--//很奇怪的是我在toad下很快完成.第1次執行需要實際長一點外,以後都很快.再次檢視執行計劃
--//注不能在toad下看,toad看僅僅看到child_number=0的執行計劃.
zzzzzz> @ dpc frzb5c8tjx9wz ''
....
SQL_ID frzb5c8tjx9wz, child number 1
-------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1956464785
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | E-Rows |E-Bytes| Cost (%CPU)| E-Time | OMem | 1Mem | Used-Mem |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 570 (100)| | | | |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | | | | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 179 | 230 (0)| 00:00:03 | | | |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 168 | 229 (0)| 00:00:03 | | | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 164 | 228 (0)| 00:00:03 | | | |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 156 | 227 (0)| 00:00:03 | | | |
....
| 50 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | | | |
|* 51 | FIXED TABLE FULL | X$KQLFXPL | 1 | 22 | 3 (100)| 00:00:01 | | | |
|* 52 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | WRH$_SQL_PLAN | 1 | 17 | 308 (1)| 00:00:04 | | | |
| 53 | SORT UNIQUE NOSORT | | 1 | 211 | 15 (7)| 00:00:01 | | | |
--//開始想是正常的,因為我在sqlplus下設定了alter session set statistics_level=all;.但是仔細看仔細計劃對於的操作id不一樣,而且Plan hash value也不同.
--//我也嘗試在toad下加入alter session set statistics_level=all;按F9執行也會執行緩慢.
zzzzzz> @ share frzb5c8tjx9wz
SQL_TEXT = SELECT /*+ aaa */ owner, index_name, -- index_type, table_NAME, COMPRESSION, UNIQUENESS, distinct_keys, AVG_LEAF_blocks_per_key, AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY,
blevel, leaf_blocks, clustering_factor, status, num_rows, sample_size, last_analyzed FROM dba_indexes WHERE owner LIKE :"SYS_B_00" AND table_name = UPPER (:"SYS_B_01") AND (owner,
index_name) IN (SELECT owner, index_name FROM dba_indexes WHERE owner LIKE :"SYS_B_02" AND index_type <> :"SYS_B_03"
MINUS (SELECT object_owner, object_name FROM v$sql_plan WHERE object_type = :"SYS_B_04" AND
object_owner LIK
SQL_ID = frzb5c8tjx9wz
ADDRESS = 00000000AA459A38
CHILD_ADDRESS = 00000000AB1E7238
CHILD_NUMBER = 0
REASON = <ChildNode><ChildNumber>0</ChildNumber><ID>45</ID><reason>NLS
Settings(0)</reason><size>2x4</size><SessionLengthSemantics>0</SessionLengthSemantics><CursorLengthSemantics>0</CursorLengthSemantics></ChildNode><ChildNode><ChildNumber>0</ChildNumber><ID>3</ID><reason>Optimizer
mismatch(12)</reason><size>2x216</size><statistics_level> all typical </statistics_level></ChildNode>
--------------------------------------------------
SQL_TEXT = SELECT /*+ aaa */ owner, index_name, -- index_type, table_NAME, COMPRESSION, UNIQUENESS, distinct_keys, AVG_LEAF_blocks_per_key, AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY,
blevel, leaf_blocks, clustering_factor, status, num_rows, sample_size, last_analyzed FROM dba_indexes WHERE owner LIKE :"SYS_B_00" AND table_name = UPPER (:"SYS_B_01") AND (owner,
index_name) IN (SELECT owner, index_name FROM dba_indexes WHERE owner LIKE :"SYS_B_02" AND index_type <> :"SYS_B_03"
MINUS (SELECT object_owner, object_name FROM v$sql_plan WHERE object_type = :"SYS_B_04" AND
object_owner LIK
SQL_ID = frzb5c8tjx9wz
ADDRESS = 00000000AA459A38
CHILD_ADDRESS = 00000000AB3775D8
CHILD_NUMBER = 1
OPTIMIZER_MISMATCH = Y
REASON = <ChildNode><ChildNumber>1</ChildNumber><ID>3</ID><reason>Optimizer mismatch(12)</reason><size>2x216</size><statistics_level> typical all </statistics_level></ChildNode>
--//我發現一個奇特的情況,sqlplus執行的語句和toad下執行的語句不能共享,提示LANGUAGE_MISMATCH= Y.
zzzzzz> select sql_id,child_number,PLAN_HASH_VALUE,buffer_gets,executions,ELAPSED_TIME from v$sql where sql_id='frzb5c8tjx9wz';
SQL_ID CHILD_NUMBER PLAN_HASH_VALUE BUFFER_GETS EXECUTIONS ELAPSED_TIME
------------- ------------ --------------- ----------- ---------- ------------
frzb5c8tjx9wz 0 2331593202 4978087 1 201931031
frzb5c8tjx9wz 1 1956464785 30458 2 1486831
--//對比2者NLS*環境:
zzzzzz> select * from nls_session_parameters ;
PARAMETER VALUE
-------------------------- ----------------------------------
NLS_LANGUAGE AMERICAN
NLS_TERRITORY AMERICA
NLS_CURRENCY $
NLS_ISO_CURRENCY AMERICA
NLS_NUMERIC_CHARACTERS .,
NLS_CALENDAR GREGORIAN
NLS_DATE_FORMAT YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS
NLS_DATE_LANGUAGE AMERICAN
NLS_SORT BINARY
NLS_TIME_FORMAT HH.MI.SSXFF AM
NLS_TIMESTAMP_FORMAT YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS.FF
NLS_TIME_TZ_FORMAT HH24.MI.SSXFF TZH:TZM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NLS_TIMESTAMP_TZ_FORMAT YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS.FF TZH:TZM
NLS_DUAL_CURRENCY $
NLS_COMP BINARY
NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS BYTE
NLS_NCHAR_CONV_EXCP FALSE
17 rows selected.
--//toad下執行:
select * from nls_session_parameters ;
PARAMETER,VALUE
NLS_LANGUAGE,AMERICAN
NLS_TERRITORY,AMERICA
NLS_CURRENCY,$
NLS_ISO_CURRENCY,AMERICA
NLS_NUMERIC_CHARACTERS,.,
NLS_CALENDAR,GREGORIAN
NLS_DATE_FORMAT,YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS
NLS_DATE_LANGUAGE,AMERICAN
NLS_SORT,BINARY
NLS_TIME_FORMAT,HH.MI.SSXFF AM
NLS_TIMESTAMP_FORMAT,YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS.FF
NLS_TIME_TZ_FORMAT,HH.MI.SSXFF AM TZR
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NLS_TIMESTAMP_TZ_FORMAT,YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS.FF TZH:TZM
NLS_DUAL_CURRENCY,$
NLS_COMP,BINARY
NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS,BYTE
NLS_NCHAR_CONV_EXCP,FALSE
--//注意下劃線,僅僅引數NLS_TIME_TZ_FORMAT不同.
$ export NLS_TIME_TZ_FORMAT='HH.MI.SSXFF AM TZR'
--//再次登入,問題消失.
alter session set statistics_level=all;
@ a.txt MS_CF01 aaa
--//很慢.登入後執行:
@ a.txt MS_CF01 aaa
--//可以發現很快,因為我在toad下已經執行過一次.
--//真心想不到這個引數,會導致這麼奇怪的問題.
--//補充說明一下:
--//如果寫成'HH24.MI.SSXFF AM TZR',呼叫sqlplus報錯.
$ export NLS_TIME_TZ_FORMAT='HH24.MI.SSXFF AM TZR'
$ rlsql system/test12@192.168.31.8:1521/hrp430
ERROR:
ORA-01818: 'HH24' precludes use of meridian indicator
SP2-0152: ORACLE may not be functioning properly
ORA-24550: signal received: [si_signo=11] [si_errno=0] [si_code=1] [si_int=0] [si_ptr=(nil)] [si_addr=0x10]
kpedbg_dmp_stack()+362<-kpeDbgCrash()+192<-kpeDbgSignalHandler()+119<-skgesig_sigactionHandler()+218<-__sighandler()<-pthread_mutex_destroy()<-kpufhndl0()+5461<-kpufhndl()+11<-OCIHandleFree()+19<-afioci()+2372<-aficnthdf()+62<-aficexf()+185<-aficex()+370<-afidrv()+321<-frame_dummy()+123<-__libc_start_main()+244
rlwrap: warning: sqlplus crashed, killed by SIGSEGV.
rlwrap itself has not crashed, but for transparency,
it will now kill itself (without dumping core) with the same signal
warnings can be silenced by the --no-warnings (-n) option
Segmentation fault
--//多次嘗試,確認實際上這個問題並不是引數NLS_TIME_TZ_FORMAT導致問題,而是執行計劃不穩定.每次分析都有可能導致新的執行計劃.
--//引數NLS_TIME_TZ_FORMAT不同,僅僅導致產生新的子游標,重新生成的執行計劃.兩者混合在一起導致問題非常怪異.
--//包括設定alter session set statistics_level=all;
--//如果我改寫成如下,無論什麼情況都是很快完成.
WITH a
AS (SELECT /*+ MATERIALIZE */ object_owner, object_name
FROM v$sql_plan
WHERE object_type = 'INDEX' AND object_owner LIKE 'XXXXXX_YYY')
SELECT /*+ &&2 */ owner
,index_name
,--index_type,
table_NAME
,COMPRESSION
,UNIQUENESS
,distinct_keys
,AVG_LEAF_blocks_per_key
,AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY
,blevel
,leaf_blocks
,clustering_factor
,status
,num_rows
,sample_size
,last_analyzed
FROM dba_indexes
WHERE owner LIKE 'XXXXXX_YYY'
AND table_name = UPPER ('&&1')
AND (owner, index_name) IN (SELECT owner, index_name
FROM dba_indexes
WHERE owner LIKE 'XXXXXX_YYY'
AND index_type <> 'LOB'
MINUS
(SELECT object_owner, object_name FROM a
UNION
SELECT object_owner, object_name
FROM dba_hist_sql_plan
WHERE object_type = 'INDEX'
AND object_owner LIKE 'XXXXXX_YYY')
MINUS
(SELECT owner, constraint_name
FROM dba_constraints
WHERE owner LIKE 'XXXXXX_YYY'
AND constraint_type IN ('P'
,'U'
,'R')));
zzzzzz> @ aaa.txt MS_CF01 aaa
zzzzzz> select sql_id,child_number,PLAN_HASH_VALUE,buffer_gets,executions,ELAPSED_TIME from v$sql where sql_id='4zapbf2u32kx2';
SQL_ID CHILD_NUMBER PLAN_HASH_VALUE BUFFER_GETS EXECUTIONS ELAPSED_TIME
------------- ------------ --------------- ----------- ---------- ------------
4zapbf2u32kx2 0 2384590172 9680 1 903877
4zapbf2u32kx2 1 115948183 11455 1 847278
zzzzzz> @ share 4zapbf2u32kx2
SQL_TEXT = with a as ( SELECT /*+ MATERIALIZE */ object_owner, object_name FROM v$sql_plan WHERE object_type = :"SYS_B_00" AND object_owner LIKE :"SYS_B_01" ) SELECT /*+ aaa */ owner, index_name, --index_type,
table_NAME, COMPRESSION, UNIQUENESS, distinct_keys, AVG_LEAF_blocks_per_key, AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY, blevel, leaf_blocks, clustering_factor, status, num_rows, sample_size,
last_analyzed FROM dba_indexes WHERE owner LIKE :"SYS_B_02" AND table_name = UPPER (:"SYS_B_03") AND (owner, index_name) IN (SELECT owner, index_name FROM dba_indexes
WHERE owner LIKE :"SYS_B_04" AND index_type <> :"SYS_B_05" MINUS (SELECT object_owner, object_name FROM a
UN
SQL_ID = 4zapbf2u32kx2
ADDRESS = 00000000A6303098
CHILD_ADDRESS = 00000000A68317F8
CHILD_NUMBER = 0
USE_FEEDBACK_STATS = Y
REASON = <ChildNode><ChildNumber>0</ChildNumber><ID>3</ID><reason>Optimizer mismatch(13)</reason><size>3x4</size><kxscflg>32</kxscflg><kxscfl4>4194560</kxscfl4><dnum_kksfcxe>262144</dnum_kksfcxe></ChildNode>
--------------------------------------------------
SQL_TEXT = with a as ( SELECT /*+ MATERIALIZE */ object_owner, object_name FROM v$sql_plan WHERE object_type = :"SYS_B_00" AND object_owner LIKE :"SYS_B_01" ) SELECT /*+ aaa */ owner, index_name, --index_type,
table_NAME, COMPRESSION, UNIQUENESS, distinct_keys, AVG_LEAF_blocks_per_key, AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY, blevel, leaf_blocks, clustering_factor, status, num_rows, sample_size,
last_analyzed FROM dba_indexes WHERE owner LIKE :"SYS_B_02" AND table_name = UPPER (:"SYS_B_03") AND (owner, index_name) IN (SELECT owner, index_name FROM dba_indexes
WHERE owner LIKE :"SYS_B_04" AND index_type <> :"SYS_B_05" MINUS (SELECT object_owner, object_name FROM a
UN
SQL_ID = 4zapbf2u32kx2
ADDRESS = 00000000A6303098
CHILD_ADDRESS = 00000000A841E528
CHILD_NUMBER = 1
REASON =
--------------------------------------------------
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
--//不過不能共享的原因是是USE_FEEDBACK_STATS=Y.
總結:
1.環境變數,執行時引數不同導致產生新的子游標,出現一些怪異的情況,感覺toad下執行快,而sqlplus下執行慢.實際上反過來的情況也出
現過.我估計cardinality FEEDBACK的影響.
2.對於複雜檢視的執行計劃先 MATERIALIZE也許能獲得好的效果.
3.我發現一個奇怪的情況就是實際上開啟alter session set statistics_level=all;就會選擇慢的執行計劃.
--//sqlplus開始第1次執行(硬分析)總是選擇慢的執行計劃.真心搞不懂....暫時放一下.
來自 “ ITPUB部落格 ” ,連結:http://blog.itpub.net/267265/viewspace-2220517/,如需轉載,請註明出處,否則將追究法律責任。
相關文章
- sql語句執行緩慢分析SQL
- [20240409]為什麼一條sql語句在例項2執行要慢的分析.txtSQL
- [20201105]再分析sql語句.txtSQL
- [20210804]oracle rac執行命令crs_stat -t -v緩慢的分析.txtOracle
- [20180409]delete刪除緩慢分析.txtdelete
- SQL語句執行順序SQL
- sql語句如何執行的SQL
- [20190125]簡單快速檢視那些sql語句正在執行.txtSQL
- [20211221]分析sql語句遇到的問題.txtSQL
- [20210923]sql語句佔用Sharable Memory分析.txtSQL
- 低效sql語句執行緩慢引起的大量佔用伺服器的CPU問題處理 (優化心得)SQL伺服器優化
- mysql的sql語句執行流程MySql
- SQL 語句的執行順序SQL
- 後臺執行SQL語句(oracle)SQLOracle
- mysql執行sql語句過程MySql
- Mybatis 動態執行SQL語句MyBatisSQL
- MySQL語句執行分析(一)MySql
- MySQL語句執行分析(二)MySql
- [20181119]使用sql profile優化問題.txtSQL優化
- [20220117]超長sql語句.txtSQL
- [20201210]sql語句優化.txtSQL優化
- Laravel 獲取執行的sql語句LaravelSQL
- MySQL cron定時執行SQL語句MySql
- java連線oracle執行sql語句JavaOracleSQL
- [20200326]dbms_monitor跟蹤與SQL語句分析.txtSQL
- Mybatis原始碼分析(五)探究SQL語句的執行過程MyBatis原始碼SQL
- [20211109]sqlplus本地登入緩慢分析2.txtSQL
- SQL Server 查詢歷史執行的SQL語句SQLServer
- 查詢Oracle正在執行的sql語句及執行該語句的使用者OracleSQL
- mysql查詢效率慢的SQL語句MySql
- SQL語句各子句的執行順序SQL
- mysql sql語句執行超時設定MySql
- Laravel 框架查詢執行的 SQL 語句Laravel框架SQL
- Mybatis原始碼解析之執行SQL語句MyBatis原始碼SQL
- 一條sql語句的執行過程SQL
- [20220331]如何調整sql語句.txtSQL
- Oracle執行語句跟蹤 使用sql trace實現語句追蹤OracleSQL
- 資料庫查詢優化:使用explain分析sql語句執行效率資料庫優化AISQL