併發insert操作導致的dead lock
說明
線上某業務最近經常會出現dead lock,相關資訊如下:
2016-06-15 20:28:25 7f72c0043700InnoDB: transactions deadlock detected, dumping detailed information.
2016-06-15 20:28:25 7f72c0043700
*** (1) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 151506716, ACTIVE 30 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 4 lock struct(s), heap size 1184, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 1467337, OS thread handle 0x7f72a84d6700, query id 308125831 IP地址1 fold-sys update
insert into t ( a,b,c, addtime )
values
(63, 27451092,120609109,now())
*** (1) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 46 page no 693076 n bits 664 index `unq_fk_key` of table `dbname`.`t` trx id 151506716 lock_mode X locks gap before rec insert intention waiting
*** (2) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 151506715, ACTIVE 30 sec inserting, thread declared inside InnoDB 1
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
4 lock struct(s), heap size 1184, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 1477334, OS thread handle 0x7f72c0043700, query id 308125813 IP地址2 fold-sys update
insert into t ( a,b,c, addtime )
values
(63, 27451092,120609109,now())
*** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):
RECORD LOCKS space id 46 page no 693076 n bits 664 index `unq_fk_folder_fk_video_seq` of table `folder`.`t_mapping_folder_video` trx id 151506715 lock mode S locks gap before rec
*** (2) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 46 page no 693076 n bits 664 index`unq_fk_key` of table `dbname`.`t` trx id 151506715 lock_mode X locks gap before rec insert intention waiting
*** WE ROLL BACK TRANSACTION (2)
初步分析
1、 122和120 在同一時刻發起了相同的insert 操作 資料一模一樣 而 a,b,c 剛好是uniq key
2、我們們是RC 級別 出現了 GAP lock 這個有點疑問?查閱了下文件
Gap locking can be disabled explicitly. This occurs if you change the transaction isolation level to READ COMMITTED or enable theinnodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog system variable (which is now deprecated). Under these circumstances, gap locking is disabled for searches and index scans and is used only for foreign-key constraint checking and duplicate-key checking.
設定innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog或者RC級別來關閉gap
後面部分 可以理解為 RC級別下的 外來鍵和重複檢查的時候也會產生GAP呢
重現此deadlock
5.5.19-55-log Percona Server (GPL), Release rel24.0, Revision 204
tx_isolation=READ-COMMITTED
innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog=OFF
建立實驗表
CREATE TABLE `deadlock` (
`id` bigint(20) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`a` smallint(5) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`b` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`c` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`d` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
UNIQUE KEY `unq_b_c_a` (`b`,`c`,`a`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
事務T1
mysql> begin;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
mysql>insert into deadlock(a,b,c) values(1,2,3);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
Records: 1 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
事務和鎖
#此時表deadlock上被加了一把意向排它鎖(IX)
---TRANSACTION 4F23D, ACTIVE 20 sec
1 lock struct(s), heap size 376, 0 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 10, OS thread handle 0x41441940, query id 237 localhost root
TABLE LOCK table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F236 lock mode IX
事務T2
mysql> begin;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> insert into deadlock(a,b,c) select 1,2,3;
#此處會處於等待
事務和鎖
---TRANSACTION 4F23E, ACTIVE 3 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 376, 1 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 7, OS thread handle 0x408d8940, query id 243 localhost root update
insert into deadlock(a,b,c) values(1,2,3)
#事務T2對錶deadlock加了一把意向排它鎖(IX),而對unq_b_c_a唯一約束檢查時需要獲取對應的共享鎖,但是對應記錄被T1加了X鎖,此處等待獲取S鎖(#注意,insert進行的是當前讀,所以讀會被X鎖阻塞。如果是快照讀的話,不需要等待X鎖)
------- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 3 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 101724 n bits 72 index `unq_b_c_a` of table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F237 lock mode S waiting
------------------
TABLE LOCK table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F237 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 101724 n bits 72 index `unq_b_c_a` of table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F237 lock mode S waiting
---TRANSACTION 4F23D, ACTIVE 37 sec
#事務T1對錶deadlock加了一把意向排它鎖(IX)和記錄鎖(X)
2 lock struct(s), heap size 376, 1 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 10, OS thread handle 0x41441940, query id 237 localhost root
TABLE LOCK table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F236 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 101724 n bits 72 index `unq_b_c_a` of table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F236 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
----------------------------
事務T3
mysql> begin;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> insert into deadlock(a,b,c) values(1,2,3);
#此處會處於等待
事務和鎖
---TRANSACTION 4F23F, ACTIVE 3 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 376, 1 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 8, OS thread handle 0x41976940, query id 245 localhost root update
insert into deadlock(a,b,c) values(1,2,3)
------- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 3 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
#同樣,事務T3與上面的事務T2的事務和鎖等待一樣,事務T1造成了T2和T3的等待
RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 101724 n bits 72 index `unq_b_c_a` of table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F238 lock mode S waiting
------------------
TABLE LOCK table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F238 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 101724 n bits 72 index `unq_b_c_a` of table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F238 lock mode S waiting
---TRANSACTION 4F23E, ACTIVE 31 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 376, 1 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 7, OS thread handle 0x408d8940, query id 243 localhost root update
insert into deadlock(a,b,c) values(1,2,3)
------- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 31 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 101724 n bits 72 index `unq_b_c_a` of table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F237 lock mode S waiting
------------------
TABLE LOCK table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F237 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 101724 n bits 72 index `unq_b_c_a` of table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F237 lock mode S waiting
---TRANSACTION 4F23D, ACTIVE 65 sec
2 lock struct(s), heap size 376, 1 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 10, OS thread handle 0x41441940, query id 237 localhost root
TABLE LOCK table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F236 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 101724 n bits 72 index `unq_b_c_a` of table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F236 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
事務T1進行rollback
#事務T1進行rollback;
mysql> rollback;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
#事務T2的insert成功
mysql> insert into deadlock(a,b,c) values(1,2,3);
Query OK, 1 row affected (10.30 sec)
#事務T3返回deadlock錯誤
mysql> insert into deadlock(a,b,c) values(1,2,3);
ERROR 1213 (40001): Deadlock found when trying to get lock; try restarting transaction
DEADLOCK資訊
------------------------
LATEST DETECTED DEADLOCK
------------------------
160620 11:38:14
*** (1) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 4F23E, ACTIVE 48 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 4 lock struct(s), heap size 1248, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 7, OS thread handle 0x408d8940, query id 297 localhost root update
insert into deadlock(a,b,c) values(1,2,3)
*** (1) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 101724 n bits 72 index `unq_b_c_a` of table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F23E lock_mode X insert intention waiting
*** (2) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 4F23F, ACTIVE 30 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
4 lock struct(s), heap size 1248, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 8, OS thread handle 0x41976940, query id 300 localhost root update
insert into deadlock(a,b,c) values(1,2,3)
*** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):
RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 101724 n bits 72 index `unq_b_c_a` of table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F23F lock mode S
*** (2) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 101724 n bits 72 index `unq_b_c_a` of table `yujx`.`deadlock` trx id 4F23F lock_mode X insert intention waiting
*** WE ROLL BACK TRANSACTION (2)
如上,只能看到事務T2和事務T3最終導致了deadlock;T2等待獲取unq_b_c_a唯一key對應的記錄鎖(X lock),T3在`unq_b_c_a`對應的記錄上持有S鎖,並且T3也在等待獲取對應的X鎖。最終T3被ROLL BACK了,並且發回了DEAD LOCK的提示資訊
綜上
1、SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS\G 看到的DEADLOCK相關資訊,只會返回最後的2個事務的資訊,而其實有可能有更多的事務才最終導致的死鎖
2、當有3個(或以上)事務對相同的表進行insert操作,如果insert對應的欄位上有uniq key約束並且第一個事務rollback了,那其中一個將返回死鎖錯誤資訊。
3、死鎖的原因
l T1 獲得 X 鎖並 insert 成功
l T2 試圖 insert, 檢查重複鍵需要獲得 S 鎖, 但試圖獲得 S 鎖失敗, 加入等待佇列, 等待 T1
l T3 試圖 insert, 檢查重複鍵需要獲得 S 鎖, 但試圖獲得 S 鎖失敗, 加入等待佇列, 等待 T1
l T1 rollback, T1 釋放鎖, 此後 T2, T3 獲得 S 鎖成功, 檢查 duplicate-key, 之後 INSERT 試圖獲得 X 鎖, 但 T2, T3 都已經獲得 S 鎖, 導致 T2, T3 死鎖
4、避免此DEADLOCK;我們都知道死鎖的問題通常都是業務處理的邏輯造成的,既然是uniq key,同時多臺不同伺服器上的相同程式對其insert一模一樣的value,這本身邏輯就不太完美。故解決此問題:
a、保證業務程式別再同一時間點併發的插入相同的值到相同的uniq key的表中
b、上述實驗可知,是由於第一個事務rollback了才產生的deadlock,查明rollback的原因
c、儘量減少完成事務的時間
最終結論
個(或以上)事務對相同的表進行insert操作,如果insert對應的欄位上有uniq key約束並且第一個事務rollback了,那其中一個將返回死鎖錯誤資訊。
參考連結:
http://songuooo.com/2015/1/7/deadlock-detected-on-concurrent-insert
來自 “ ITPUB部落格 ” ,連結:http://blog.itpub.net/27000195/viewspace-2120472/,如需轉載,請註明出處,否則將追究法律責任。
相關文章
- Dead lock - oracleOracle
- 【kingsql分享】併發操作導致阻塞的簡單分析和管理SQL
- mysql dead lock detectionMySql
- oracle dead lock與效能Oracle
- [Java併發]LockJava
- Oracle中的死鎖Dead Lock(一)Oracle
- Oracle中的死鎖Dead Lock(二)Oracle
- mysql的新建索引會導致insert被lockedMySql索引
- ora-00054 表被lock導致資源忙等待不能操作案例
- dbms_lock同步併發
- DELETE資料導致INSERT邏輯讀增加delete
- 使用資料庫處理併發可能導致的問題資料庫
- 併發程式設計之:Lock程式設計
- Java併發程式設計:LockJava程式設計
- 一條insert語句導致的效能問題分析(二)
- 一條insert語句導致的效能問題分析(一)
- Java 併發開發:Lock 框架詳解Java框架
- split分割槽操作導致的librarycachelock
- oracle的單例項併發控制:Lock(一)Oracle單例
- 併發Lock之AQS(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer)詳解AQS
- java安全編碼指南之:死鎖dead lockJava
- 併發請求導致的業務處理安全風險及解決方案求導
- MySQL:RR模式下insert也可能導致查詢慢MySql模式
- 【巨杉資料庫Sequoiadb】【諮詢】【資料操作】【索引】高併發 insert資料庫索引
- ORACLE 歸檔空間滿導致的enq: TX - row lock contentionOracleENQ
- Go 併發操作Go
- 解決new Thread().Start導致高併發CPU 100%的問題thread
- 併發Lock之ReentrantLock實現原理ReentrantLock
- git合併丟失程式碼問題分析與解決(錯誤操作導致)Git
- 我渴望的insert操作!
- 11G 修改使用者密碼導致的row cache lock密碼
- 主鍵自增,Insert為0的記錄導致資料混亂
- Java併發指南4:Java中的鎖 Lock和synchronizedJavasynchronized
- 併發程式設計的鎖機制:synchronized和lock程式設計synchronized
- mysql lock操作MySql
- oracle 使用者user鎖定lock如何知道是什麼原因導致的Oracle
- 故障分析 | 從 Insert 併發死鎖分析 Insert 加鎖原始碼邏輯原始碼
- c#中的insert操作C#