SMON功能(三):清理obj$基表

n-lauren發表於2016-11-20

SMON的作用還包括清理obj$資料字典基表(cleanup obj$)

OBJ$字典基表是Oracle Bootstarp啟動自舉的重要物件之一:

SQL> set linesize 80 ;
SQL> select sql_text from bootstrap$ where sql_text like 'CREATE TABLE OBJ$%';

SQL_TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CREATE TABLE OBJ$("OBJ#" NUMBER NOT NULL,"DATAOBJ#" NUMBER,"OWNER#" NUMBER NOT N
ULL,"NAME" VARCHAR2(30) NOT NULL,"NAMESPACE" NUMBER NOT NULL,"SUBNAME" VARCHAR2(
30),"TYPE#" NUMBER NOT NULL,"CTIME" DATE NOT NULL,"MTIME" DATE NOT NULL,"STIME"
DATE NOT NULL,"STATUS" NUMBER NOT NULL,"REMOTEOWNER" VARCHAR2(30),"LINKNAME" VAR
CHAR2(128),"FLAGS" NUMBER,"OID$" RAW(16),"SPARE1" NUMBER,"SPARE2" NUMBER,"SPARE3
" NUMBER,"SPARE4" VARCHAR2(1000),"SPARE5" VARCHAR2(1000),"SPARE6" DATE) PCTFREE
10 PCTUSED 40 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255 STORAGE (  INITIAL 16K NEXT 1024K MINEXTEN
TS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 OBJNO 18 EXTENTS (FILE 1 BLOCK 121))

 

觸發場景

OBJ$基表是一張低階資料字典表,該表幾乎對庫中的每個物件(表、索引、包、檢視等)都包含有一行記錄。很多情況下,這些條目所代表的物件是不存在的物件(non-existent),引起這種現象的一種可能的原因是物件本身已經被從資料庫中刪除了,但是物件條目仍被保留下來以滿足消極依賴機制(negative dependency)。因為這些條目的存在會導致OBJ$表不斷膨脹,這時就需要由SMON程式來刪除這些不再需要的行。SMON會在例項啟動(after startup of DB is started cleanup function again)時以及啟動後的每12個小時執行一次清理任務(the cleanup is scheduled to run after startup and then every 12 hours)。

我們可以通過以下演示來了解SMON清理obj$的過程:

SQL>  BEGIN
  2      FOR i IN 1 .. 5000 LOOP
  3      execute immediate ('create synonym gustav' || i || ' for
  4  perfstat.sometable');
  5      execute immediate ('drop   synonym gustav' || i );
  6      END LOOP;
  7    END;
  8    /

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL> startup force;
ORACLE instance started.

Total System Global Area 1065353216 bytes
Fixed Size                  2089336 bytes
Variable Size             486542984 bytes
Database Buffers          570425344 bytes
Redo Buffers                6295552 bytes
Database mounted.
Database opened.

SQL>   select count(*) from user$ u, obj$ o
  2        where u.user# (+)=o.owner# and o.type#=10 and not exists
  3        (select p_obj# from dependency$ where p_obj# = o.obj#);

  COUNT(*)
----------
      5000

SQL> /

  COUNT(*)
----------
      5000

SQL> /

  COUNT(*)
----------
      4951

SQL> oradebug setospid 18457;
Oracle pid: 8, Unix process pid: 18457, image: oracle@rh2.oracle.com (SMON)

SQL> oradebug event 10046 trace name context forever ,level 1;
Statement processed.

SQL> oradebug tracefile_name;
/s01/admin/G10R2/bdump/g10r2_smon_18457.trc

select o.owner#,
       o.obj#,
       decode(o.linkname,
              null,
              decode(u.name, null, 'SYS', u.name),
              o.remoteowner),
       o.name,
       o.linkname,
       o.namespace,
       o.subname
  from user$ u, obj$ o
 where u.use r#(+) = o.owner#
   and o.type# = :1
   and not exists
 (select p_obj# from dependency$ where p_obj# = o.obj#)
 order by o.obj#
   for update

select null
  from obj$
 where obj# = :1
   and type# = :2
   and obj# not in
       (select p_obj# from dependency$ where p_obj# = obj$.obj#)

delete from obj$ where obj# = :1

/* 刪除過程其實較為複雜,可能要刪除多個字典基表上的記錄 */

現象

我們可以通過以下查詢來了解obj$基表中NON-EXISTENT物件的條目總數(type#=10),若這個總數在不斷減少說明smon正在執行清理工作
obj$_type#=10

    select trunc(mtime), substr(name, 1, 3) name, count(*)
      from obj$
     where type# = 10
       and not exists (select * from dependency$ where obj# = p_obj#)
     group by trunc(mtime), substr(name, 1, 3);

      select count(*)
        from user$ u, obj$ o
       where u.user#(+) = o.owner#
         and o.type# = 10
         and not exists
       (select p_obj# from dependency$ where p_obj# = o.obj#);

如何禁止SMON清理obj$基表

我們可以通過設定診斷事件event=’10052 trace name context forever’來禁止SMON清理obj$基表,當我們需要避免SMON因cleanup obj$的相關程式碼而意外終止或spin從而開展進一步的診斷時可以設定該診斷事件。在Oracle並行伺服器或RAC環境中,也可以設定該事件來保證只有特定的某個節點來執行清理工作。

10052, 00000, "don't clean up obj$" alter system set events '10052 trace name context forever, level 65535'; Problem Description: We are receiving the below warning during db startup:
WARNING: kqlclo() has detected the following :
Non-existent object 37336 NOT deleted because an object
of the same name exists already.
Object name: PUBLIC.USER$

This is caused by the SMON trying to cleanup the SYS.OJB$.
SMON cleans all dropped objects which have a SYS.OBJ$.TYPE#=10. 
This can happen very often when you create an object that have the same name as a public synonym. 

When SMON is trying to remove non-existent objects and fails because there are duplicates, 
multiple nonexistent objects with same name.
This query will returned many objects with same name under SYS schema:

select o.name,u.user# from user$ u, obj$ o where u.user# (+)=o.owner# and o.type#=10 
and not exists (select p_obj# from dependency$ where p_obj# = o.obj#);

To cleanup this message:

Take a full backup of the database - this is crucial. If anything goes wrong during this procedure, 
your only option would be to restore from backup, so make sure you have a good backup before proceeding. 
We suggest a COLD backup. If you plan to use a HOT backup, you will have to restore point in time if any problem happens

Normally DML against dictionary objects is unsupported, 
but in this case we know exactly what the type of corruption, 
also you are instructing to do this under guidance from Support.

Data dictionary patching must be done by an experienced DBA. 
This solution is unsupported. 
It means that if there were problems after applying this solution, a database backup must be restored.

1. Set event 10052 at parameter file to disable cleanup of OBJ$ by SMON

EVENT="10052 trace name context forever, level 65535"

2. Startup database in restricted mode

3. Delete from OBJ$, COMMIT

SQL> delete from obj$ where (name,owner#) in ( select o.name,u.user# from user$ u, obj$ o
where u.user# (+)=o.owner# and o.type#=10 and not exists (select p_obj# from
dependency$ where p_obj# = o.obj#) );

SQL> commit;

SQL> Shutdown abort.

4. remove event 10052 from init.ora

5. Restart the database and monitor for the message in the ALERT LOG file

來自 “ ITPUB部落格 ” ,連結:http://blog.itpub.net/22990797/viewspace-2128772/,如需轉載,請註明出處,否則將追究法律責任。

相關文章