OkHttp 3.7原始碼分析（四）——快取策略

yangxi_001發表於2017-06-19

HTTP原始碼快取

合理地利用本地快取可以有效地減少網路開銷，減少響應延遲。HTTP報頭也定義了很多與快取有關的域來控制快取。今天就來講講OkHttp中關於快取部分的實現細節。

1. HTTP快取策略

首先來了解下HTTP協議中快取部分的相關域。

1.1 Expires

超時時間，一般用在伺服器的response報頭中用於告知客戶端對應資源的過期時間。當客戶端需要再次請求相同資源時先比較其過期時間，如果尚未超過過期時間則直接返回快取結果，如果已經超過則重新請求。

1.2 Cache-Control

相對值，單位時秒，表示當前資源的有效期。Cache-Control比Expires優先順序更高：

Cache-Control:max-age=31536000,public

1.3 條件GET請求

1.3.1 Last-Modified-Date

客戶端第一次請求時，伺服器返回：

Last-Modified: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:31:27 GMT

當客戶端二次請求時，可以頭部加上如下header:

If-Modified-Since: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:31:27 GMT

如果當前資源沒有被二次修改，伺服器返回304告知客戶端直接複用本地快取。

1.3.2 ETag

ETag是對資原始檔的一種摘要，可以通過ETag值來判斷檔案是否有修改。當客戶端第一次請求某資源時，伺服器返回：

ETag: "5694c7ef-24dc"

客戶端再次請求時，可在頭部加上如下域：

If-None-Match: "5694c7ef-24dc"

如果檔案並未改變，則伺服器返回304告知客戶端可以複用本地快取。

1.4 no-cache/no-store

不使用快取

1.5 only-if-cached

只使用快取

2. Cache原始碼分析

OkHttp的快取工作都是在CacheInterceptor中完成的,Cache部分有如下幾個關鍵類：

Cache：Cache管理器，其內部包含一個DiskLruCache將cache寫入檔案系統:

 * <h3>Cache Optimization</h3>
 *
 * <p>To measure cache effectiveness, this class tracks three statistics:
 * <ul>
 *     <li><strong>{@linkplain #requestCount() Request Count:}</strong> the number of HTTP
 *         requests issued since this cache was created.
 *     <li><strong>{@linkplain #networkCount() Network Count:}</strong> the number of those
 *         requests that required network use.
 *     <li><strong>{@linkplain #hitCount() Hit Count:}</strong> the number of those requests
 *         whose responses were served by the cache.
 * </ul>
 *
 * Sometimes a request will result in a conditional cache hit. If the cache contains a stale copy of
 * the response, the client will issue a conditional {@code GET}. The server will then send either
 * the updated response if it has changed, or a short 'not modified' response if the client's copy
 * is still valid. Such responses increment both the network count and hit count.
 *
 * <p>The best way to improve the cache hit rate is by configuring the web server to return
 * cacheable responses. Although this client honors all <a
 * href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234">HTTP/1.1 (RFC 7234)</a> cache headers, it doesn't cache
 * partial responses.

Cache內部通過requestCount,networkCount,hitCount三個統計指標來優化快取效率

CacheStrategy：快取策略。其內部維護一個request和response，通過指定request和response來描述是通過網路還是快取獲取response，抑或二者同時使用

[CacheStrategy.java]
/**
* Given a request and cached response, this figures out whether to use the network, the cache, or
* both.
*
* <p>Selecting a cache strategy may add conditions to the request (like the "If-Modified-Since"
* header for conditional GETs) or warnings to the cached response (if the cached data is
* potentially stale).
*/
public final class CacheStrategy {
 /** The request to send on the network, or null if this call doesn't use the network. */
 public final Request networkRequest;

 /** The cached response to return or validate; or null if this call doesn't use a cache. */
 public final Response cacheResponse;
 ......
}

CacheStrategy$Factory:快取策略工廠類根據實際請求返回對應的快取策略

既然實際的快取工作都是在CacheInterceptor中完成的，那麼接下來看下CahceInterceptor的核心方法intercept方法原始碼:

[CacheInterceptor.java]
@Override public Response intercept(Chain chain) throws IOException {
    //首先嚐試獲取快取
    Response cacheCandidate = cache != null
        ? cache.get(chain.request())
        : null;

    long now = System.currentTimeMillis();

    //獲取快取策略
    CacheStrategy strategy = new CacheStrategy.Factory(now, chain.request(), cacheCandidate).get();
    Request networkRequest = strategy.networkRequest;
    Response cacheResponse = strategy.cacheResponse;

    //如果有快取，更新下相關統計指標：命中率
    if (cache != null) {
      cache.trackResponse(strategy);
    }

    //如果當前快取不符合要求，將其close
    if (cacheCandidate != null && cacheResponse == null) {
      closeQuietly(cacheCandidate.body()); // The cache candidate wasn't applicable. Close it.
    }

    // 如果不能使用網路，同時又沒有符合條件的快取，直接拋504錯誤
    if (networkRequest == null && cacheResponse == null) {
      return new Response.Builder()
          .request(chain.request())
          .protocol(Protocol.HTTP_1_1)
          .code(504)
          .message("Unsatisfiable Request (only-if-cached)")
          .body(Util.EMPTY_RESPONSE)
          .sentRequestAtMillis(-1L)
          .receivedResponseAtMillis(System.currentTimeMillis())
          .build();
    }

    // 如果有快取同時又不使用網路，則直接返回快取結果
    if (networkRequest == null) {
      return cacheResponse.newBuilder()
          .cacheResponse(stripBody(cacheResponse))
          .build();
    }

    //嘗試通過網路獲取回覆
    Response networkResponse = null;
    try {
      networkResponse = chain.proceed(networkRequest);
    } finally {
      // If we're crashing on I/O or otherwise, don't leak the cache body.
      if (networkResponse == null && cacheCandidate != null) {
        closeQuietly(cacheCandidate.body());
      }
    }

    // 如果既有快取，同時又發起了請求，說明此時是一個Conditional Get請求
    if (cacheResponse != null) {
      // 如果服務端返回的是NOT_MODIFIED,快取有效，將本地快取和網路響應做合併
      if (networkResponse.code() == HTTP_NOT_MODIFIED) {
        Response response = cacheResponse.newBuilder()
            .headers(combine(cacheResponse.headers(), networkResponse.headers()))
            .sentRequestAtMillis(networkResponse.sentRequestAtMillis())
            .receivedResponseAtMillis(networkResponse.receivedResponseAtMillis())
            .cacheResponse(stripBody(cacheResponse))
            .networkResponse(stripBody(networkResponse))
            .build();
        networkResponse.body().close();

        // Update the cache after combining headers but before stripping the
        // Content-Encoding header (as performed by initContentStream()).
        cache.trackConditionalCacheHit();
        cache.update(cacheResponse, response);
        return response;
      } else {// 如果響應資源有更新，關掉原有快取
        closeQuietly(cacheResponse.body());
      }
    }

    Response response = networkResponse.newBuilder()
        .cacheResponse(stripBody(cacheResponse))
        .networkResponse(stripBody(networkResponse))
        .build();

    if (cache != null) {
      if (HttpHeaders.hasBody(response) && CacheStrategy.isCacheable(response, networkRequest)) {
        // 將網路響應寫入cache中
        CacheRequest cacheRequest = cache.put(response);
        return cacheWritingResponse(cacheRequest, response);
      }

      if (HttpMethod.invalidatesCache(networkRequest.method())) {
        try {
          cache.remove(networkRequest);
        } catch (IOException ignored) {
          // The cache cannot be written.
        }
      }
    }

    return response;
  }

核心邏輯都以中文註釋的形式在程式碼中標註出來了，大家看程式碼即可。通過上面的程式碼可以看出，幾乎所有的動作都是以CacheStrategy快取策略為依據做出的，那麼接下來看下快取策略是如何生成的，相關程式碼實現在CacheStrategy$Factory.get()方法中：

[CacheStrategy$Factory]

    /**
     * Returns a strategy to satisfy {@code request} using the a cached response {@code response}.
     */
    public CacheStrategy get() {
      CacheStrategy candidate = getCandidate();

      if (candidate.networkRequest != null && request.cacheControl().onlyIfCached()) {
        // We're forbidden from using the network and the cache is insufficient.
        return new CacheStrategy(null, null);
      }

      return candidate;
    }

    /** Returns a strategy to use assuming the request can use the network. */
    private CacheStrategy getCandidate() {
      // 若本地沒有快取，發起網路請求
      if (cacheResponse == null) {
        return new CacheStrategy(request, null);
      }

      // 如果當前請求是HTTPS，而快取沒有TLS握手，重新發起網路請求
      if (request.isHttps() && cacheResponse.handshake() == null) {
        return new CacheStrategy(request, null);
      }

      // If this response shouldn't have been stored, it should never be used
      // as a response source. This check should be redundant as long as the
      // persistence store is well-behaved and the rules are constant.
      if (!isCacheable(cacheResponse, request)) {
        return new CacheStrategy(request, null);
      }


      //如果當前的快取策略是不快取或者是conditional get，發起網路請求
      CacheControl requestCaching = request.cacheControl();
      if (requestCaching.noCache() || hasConditions(request)) {
        return new CacheStrategy(request, null);
      }

      //ageMillis:快取age
      long ageMillis = cacheResponseAge();
      //freshMillis：快取保鮮時間
      long freshMillis = computeFreshnessLifetime();

      if (requestCaching.maxAgeSeconds() != -1) {
        freshMillis = Math.min(freshMillis, SECONDS.toMillis(requestCaching.maxAgeSeconds()));
      }

      long minFreshMillis = 0;
      if (requestCaching.minFreshSeconds() != -1) {
        minFreshMillis = SECONDS.toMillis(requestCaching.minFreshSeconds());
      }

      long maxStaleMillis = 0;
      CacheControl responseCaching = cacheResponse.cacheControl();
      if (!responseCaching.mustRevalidate() && requestCaching.maxStaleSeconds() != -1) {
        maxStaleMillis = SECONDS.toMillis(requestCaching.maxStaleSeconds());
      }

      //如果 age + min-fresh >= max-age && age + min-fresh < max-age + max-stale，則雖然快取過期了，     //但是快取繼續可以使用，只是在頭部新增 110 警告碼
      if (!responseCaching.noCache() && ageMillis + minFreshMillis < freshMillis + maxStaleMillis)      {
        Response.Builder builder = cacheResponse.newBuilder();
        if (ageMillis + minFreshMillis >= freshMillis) {
          builder.addHeader("Warning", "110 HttpURLConnection \"Response is stale\"");
        }
        long oneDayMillis = 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000L;
        if (ageMillis > oneDayMillis && isFreshnessLifetimeHeuristic()) {
          builder.addHeader("Warning", "113 HttpURLConnection \"Heuristic expiration\"");
        }
        return new CacheStrategy(null, builder.build());
      }

      // 發起conditional get請求
      String conditionName;
      String conditionValue;
      if (etag != null) {
        conditionName = "If-None-Match";
        conditionValue = etag;
      } else if (lastModified != null) {
        conditionName = "If-Modified-Since";
        conditionValue = lastModifiedString;
      } else if (servedDate != null) {
        conditionName = "If-Modified-Since";
        conditionValue = servedDateString;
      } else {
        return new CacheStrategy(request, null); // No condition! Make a regular request.
      }

      Headers.Builder conditionalRequestHeaders = request.headers().newBuilder();
      Internal.instance.addLenient(conditionalRequestHeaders, conditionName, conditionValue);

      Request conditionalRequest = request.newBuilder()
          .headers(conditionalRequestHeaders.build())
          .build();
      return new CacheStrategy(conditionalRequest, cacheResponse);
    }

可以看到其核心邏輯在getCandidate函式中。基本就是HTTP快取協議的實現，核心程式碼邏輯已通過中文註釋說明，大家直接看程式碼就好。

3. DiskLruCache

Cache內部通過DiskLruCache管理cache在檔案系統層面的建立，讀取，清理等等工作，接下來看下DiskLruCache的主要邏輯：

public final class DiskLruCache implements Closeable, Flushable {

  final FileSystem fileSystem;
  final File directory;
  private final File journalFile;
  private final File journalFileTmp;
  private final File journalFileBackup;
  private final int appVersion;
  private long maxSize;
  final int valueCount;
  private long size = 0;
  BufferedSink journalWriter;
  final LinkedHashMap<String, Entry> lruEntries = new LinkedHashMap<>(0, 0.75f, true);

  // Must be read and written when synchronized on 'this'.
  boolean initialized;
  boolean closed;
  boolean mostRecentTrimFailed;
  boolean mostRecentRebuildFailed;

  /**
   * To differentiate between old and current snapshots, each entry is given a sequence number each
   * time an edit is committed. A snapshot is stale if its sequence number is not equal to its
   * entry's sequence number.
   */
  private long nextSequenceNumber = 0;

  /** Used to run 'cleanupRunnable' for journal rebuilds. */
  private final Executor executor;
  private final Runnable cleanupRunnable = new Runnable() {
    public void run() {
        ......
    }
  };
  ...
  }

3.1 journalFile

DiskLruCache內部日誌檔案，對cache的每一次讀寫都對應一條日誌記錄，DiskLruCache通過分析日誌分析和建立cache。日誌檔案格式如下：

      libcore.io.DiskLruCache
      1
      100
      2

      CLEAN 3400330d1dfc7f3f7f4b8d4d803dfcf6 832 21054
      DIRTY 335c4c6028171cfddfbaae1a9c313c52
      CLEAN 335c4c6028171cfddfbaae1a9c313c52 3934 2342
      REMOVE 335c4c6028171cfddfbaae1a9c313c52
      DIRTY 1ab96a171faeeee38496d8b330771a7a
      CLEAN 1ab96a171faeeee38496d8b330771a7a 1600 234
      READ 335c4c6028171cfddfbaae1a9c313c52
      READ 3400330d1dfc7f3f7f4b8d4d803dfcf6

     前5行固定不變，分別為：常量：libcore.io.DiskLruCache；diskCache版本；應用程式版本；valueCount(後文介紹)，空行

     接下來每一行對應一個cache entry的一次狀態記錄，其格式為：[狀態（DIRTY,CLEAN,READ,REMOVE），key，狀態相關value(可選)]:
     - DIRTY:表明一個cache entry正在被建立或更新，每一個成功的DIRTY記錄都應該對應一個CLEAN或REMOVE操作。如果一個DIRTY缺少預期匹配的CLEAN/REMOVE，則對應entry操作失敗，需要將其從lruEntries中刪除
     - CLEAN:說明cache已經被成功操作，當前可以被正常讀取。每一個CLEAN行還需要記錄其每一個value的長度
     - READ: 記錄一次cache讀取操作
     - REMOVE:記錄一次cache清除

日誌檔案的應用場景主要有四個：

DiskCacheLru初始化時通過讀取日誌檔案建立cache容器：lruEntries。同時通過日誌過濾操作不成功的cache項。相關邏輯在DiskLruCache.readJournalLine,DiskLruCache.processJournal
初始化完成後，為避免日誌檔案不斷膨脹，對日誌進行重建精簡，具體邏輯在DiskLruCache.rebuildJournal
每當有cache操作時將其記錄入日誌檔案中以備下次初始化時使用
當冗餘日誌過多時，通過呼叫cleanUpRunnable執行緒重建日誌

3.2 DiskLruCache.Entry

每一個DiskLruCache.Entry對應一個cache記錄：

  private final class Entry {
    final String key;

    /** Lengths of this entry's files. */
    final long[] lengths;
    final File[] cleanFiles;
    final File[] dirtyFiles;

    /** True if this entry has ever been published. */
    boolean readable;

    /** The ongoing edit or null if this entry is not being edited. */
    Editor currentEditor;

    /** The sequence number of the most recently committed edit to this entry. */
    long sequenceNumber;

    Entry(String key) {
      this.key = key;

      lengths = new long[valueCount];
      cleanFiles = new File[valueCount];
      dirtyFiles = new File[valueCount];

      // The names are repetitive so re-use the same builder to avoid allocations.
      StringBuilder fileBuilder = new StringBuilder(key).append('.');
      int truncateTo = fileBuilder.length();
      for (int i = 0; i < valueCount; i++) {
        fileBuilder.append(i);
        cleanFiles[i] = new File(directory, fileBuilder.toString());
        fileBuilder.append(".tmp");
        dirtyFiles[i] = new File(directory, fileBuilder.toString());
        fileBuilder.setLength(truncateTo);
      }
    }
    ...

        /**
     * Returns a snapshot of this entry. This opens all streams eagerly to guarantee that we see a
     * single published snapshot. If we opened streams lazily then the streams could come from
     * different edits.
     */
    Snapshot snapshot() {
      if (!Thread.holdsLock(DiskLruCache.this)) throw new AssertionError();

      Source[] sources = new Source[valueCount];
      long[] lengths = this.lengths.clone(); // Defensive copy since these can be zeroed out.
      try {
        for (int i = 0; i < valueCount; i++) {
          sources[i] = fileSystem.source(cleanFiles[i]);
        }
        return new Snapshot(key, sequenceNumber, sources, lengths);
      } catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
        // A file must have been deleted manually!
        for (int i = 0; i < valueCount; i++) {
          if (sources[i] != null) {
            Util.closeQuietly(sources[i]);
          } else {
            break;
          }
        }
        // Since the entry is no longer valid, remove it so the metadata is accurate (i.e. the cache
        // size.)
        try {
          removeEntry(this);
        } catch (IOException ignored) {
        }
        return null;
      }
    }
  }

一個Entry主要由以下幾部分構成：

key：每個cache都有一個key作為其識別符號。當前cache的key為其對應URL的MD5字串
cleanFiles/dirtyFiles：每一個Entry對應多個檔案，其對應的檔案數由DiskLruCache.valueCount指定。當前在OkHttp中valueCount為2。即每個cache對應2個cleanFiles，2個dirtyFiles。其中第一個cleanFiles/dirtyFiles記錄cache的meta資料（如URL,建立時間，SSL握手記錄等等），第二個檔案記錄cache的真正內容。cleanFiles記錄處於穩定狀態的cache結果，dirtyFiles記錄處於建立或更新狀態的cache
currentEditor：entry編輯器，對entry的所有操作都是通過其編輯器完成。編輯器內部新增了同步鎖

3.3 cleanupRunnable

清理執行緒，用於重建精簡日誌：

  private final Runnable cleanupRunnable = new Runnable() {
    public void run() {
      synchronized (DiskLruCache.this) {
        if (!initialized | closed) {
          return; // Nothing to do
        }

        try {
          trimToSize();
        } catch (IOException ignored) {
          mostRecentTrimFailed = true;
        }

        try {
          if (journalRebuildRequired()) {
            rebuildJournal();
            redundantOpCount = 0;
          }
        } catch (IOException e) {
          mostRecentRebuildFailed = true;
          journalWriter = Okio.buffer(Okio.blackhole());
        }
      }
    }
  };

其觸發條件在journalRebuildRequired()方法中：

  /**
   * We only rebuild the journal when it will halve the size of the journal and eliminate at least
   * 2000 ops.
   */
  boolean journalRebuildRequired() {
    final int redundantOpCompactThreshold = 2000;
    return redundantOpCount >= redundantOpCompactThreshold
        && redundantOpCount >= lruEntries.size();
  }

當冗餘日誌超過日誌檔案本身的一般且總條數超過2000時執行

3.4 SnapShot

cache快照，記錄了特定cache在某一個特定時刻的內容。每次向DiskLruCache請求時返回的都是目標cache的一個快照,相關邏輯在DiskLruCache.get中：

[DiskLruCache.java]  
/**
   * Returns a snapshot of the entry named {@code key}, or null if it doesn't exist is not currently
   * readable. If a value is returned, it is moved to the head of the LRU queue.
   */
  public synchronized Snapshot get(String key) throws IOException {
    initialize();

    checkNotClosed();
    validateKey(key);
    Entry entry = lruEntries.get(key);
    if (entry == null || !entry.readable) return null;

    Snapshot snapshot = entry.snapshot();
    if (snapshot == null) return null;

    redundantOpCount++;
    //日誌記錄
    journalWriter.writeUtf8(READ).writeByte(' ').writeUtf8(key).writeByte('\n');
    if (journalRebuildRequired()) {
      executor.execute(cleanupRunnable);
    }

    return snapshot;
  }

3.5 lruEntries

管理cache entry的容器，其資料結構是LinkedHashMap。通過LinkedHashMap本身的實現邏輯達到cache的LRU替換

3.6 FileSystem

使用Okio對File的封裝，簡化了I/O操作。

3.7 DiskLruCache.edit

DiskLruCache可以看成是Cache在檔案系統層的具體實現，所以其基本操作介面存在一一對應的關係：

Cache.get() —>DiskLruCache.get()
Cache.put()—>DiskLruCache.edit() //cache插入
Cache.remove()—>DiskLruCache.remove()
Cache.update()—>DiskLruCache.edit()//cache更新

其中get操作在3.4已經介紹了，remove操作較為簡單，put和update大致邏輯相似，因為篇幅限制，這裡僅介紹Cache.put操作的邏輯，其他的操作大家看程式碼就好:

[okhttp3.Cache.java]
  CacheRequest put(Response response) {
    String requestMethod = response.request().method();

    if (HttpMethod.invalidatesCache(response.request().method())) {
      try {
        remove(response.request());
      } catch (IOException ignored) {
        // The cache cannot be written.
      }
      return null;
    }
    if (!requestMethod.equals("GET")) {
      // Don't cache non-GET responses. We're technically allowed to cache
      // HEAD requests and some POST requests, but the complexity of doing
      // so is high and the benefit is low.
      return null;
    }

    if (HttpHeaders.hasVaryAll(response)) {
      return null;
    }

    Entry entry = new Entry(response);
    DiskLruCache.Editor editor = null;
    try {
      editor = cache.edit(key(response.request().url()));
      if (editor == null) {
        return null;
      }
      entry.writeTo(editor);
      return new CacheRequestImpl(editor);
    } catch (IOException e) {
      abortQuietly(editor);
      return null;
    }
  }

可以看到核心邏輯在editor = cache.edit(key(response.request().url()));,相關程式碼在DiskLruCache.edit:

[okhttp3.internal.cache.DiskLruCache.java]  
synchronized Editor edit(String key, long expectedSequenceNumber) throws IOException {
    initialize();

    checkNotClosed();
    validateKey(key);
    Entry entry = lruEntries.get(key);
    if (expectedSequenceNumber != ANY_SEQUENCE_NUMBER && (entry == null
        || entry.sequenceNumber != expectedSequenceNumber)) {
      return null; // Snapshot is stale.
    }
    if (entry != null && entry.currentEditor != null) {
      return null; // 當前cache entry正在被其他物件操作
    }
    if (mostRecentTrimFailed || mostRecentRebuildFailed) {
      // The OS has become our enemy! If the trim job failed, it means we are storing more data than
      // requested by the user. Do not allow edits so we do not go over that limit any further. If
      // the journal rebuild failed, the journal writer will not be active, meaning we will not be
      // able to record the edit, causing file leaks. In both cases, we want to retry the clean up
      // so we can get out of this state!
      executor.execute(cleanupRunnable);
      return null;
    }

    // 日誌接入DIRTY記錄
    journalWriter.writeUtf8(DIRTY).writeByte(' ').writeUtf8(key).writeByte('\n');
    journalWriter.flush();

    if (hasJournalErrors) {
      return null; // Don't edit; the journal can't be written.
    }

    if (entry == null) {
      entry = new Entry(key);
      lruEntries.put(key, entry);
    }
    Editor editor = new Editor(entry);
    entry.currentEditor = editor;
    return editor;
  }

edit方法返回對應CacheEntry的editor編輯器。接下來再來看下Cache.put()方法的entry.writeTo(editor);,其相關邏輯：

[okhttp3.internal.cache.DiskLruCache.java]    
public void writeTo(DiskLruCache.Editor editor) throws IOException {
      BufferedSink sink = Okio.buffer(editor.newSink(ENTRY_METADATA));

      sink.writeUtf8(url)
          .writeByte('\n');
      sink.writeUtf8(requestMethod)
          .writeByte('\n');
      sink.writeDecimalLong(varyHeaders.size())
          .writeByte('\n');
      for (int i = 0, size = varyHeaders.size(); i < size; i++) {
        sink.writeUtf8(varyHeaders.name(i))
            .writeUtf8(": ")
            .writeUtf8(varyHeaders.value(i))
            .writeByte('\n');
      }

      sink.writeUtf8(new StatusLine(protocol, code, message).toString())
          .writeByte('\n');
      sink.writeDecimalLong(responseHeaders.size() + 2)
          .writeByte('\n');
      for (int i = 0, size = responseHeaders.size(); i < size; i++) {
        sink.writeUtf8(responseHeaders.name(i))
            .writeUtf8(": ")
            .writeUtf8(responseHeaders.value(i))
            .writeByte('\n');
      }
      sink.writeUtf8(SENT_MILLIS)
          .writeUtf8(": ")
          .writeDecimalLong(sentRequestMillis)
          .writeByte('\n');
      sink.writeUtf8(RECEIVED_MILLIS)
          .writeUtf8(": ")
          .writeDecimalLong(receivedResponseMillis)
          .writeByte('\n');

      if (isHttps()) {
        sink.writeByte('\n');
        sink.writeUtf8(handshake.cipherSuite().javaName())
            .writeByte('\n');
        writeCertList(sink, handshake.peerCertificates());
        writeCertList(sink, handshake.localCertificates());
        // The handshake’s TLS version is null on HttpsURLConnection and on older cached responses.
        if (handshake.tlsVersion() != null) {
          sink.writeUtf8(handshake.tlsVersion().javaName())
              .writeByte('\n');
        }
      }
      sink.close();
    }

其主要邏輯就是將對應請求的meta資料寫入對應CacheEntry的索引為ENTRY_METADATA（0）的dirtyfile中。

最後再來看Cache.put()方法的return new CacheRequestImpl(editor);:

[okhttp3.Cache$CacheRequestImpl]
private final class CacheRequestImpl implements CacheRequest {
    private final DiskLruCache.Editor editor;
    private Sink cacheOut;
    private Sink body;
    boolean done;

    public CacheRequestImpl(final DiskLruCache.Editor editor) {
      this.editor = editor;
      this.cacheOut = editor.newSink(ENTRY_BODY);
      this.body = new ForwardingSink(cacheOut) {
        @Override public void close() throws IOException {
          synchronized (Cache.this) {
            if (done) {
              return;
            }
            done = true;
            writeSuccessCount++;
          }
          super.close();
          editor.commit();
        }
      };
    }

    @Override public void abort() {
      synchronized (Cache.this) {
        if (done) {
          return;
        }
        done = true;
        writeAbortCount++;
      }
      Util.closeQuietly(cacheOut);
      try {
        editor.abort();
      } catch (IOException ignored) {
      }
    }

    @Override public Sink body() {
      return body;
    }
  }

其中close,abort方法會呼叫editor.abort和editor.commit來更新日誌，editor.commit還會將dirtyFile重置為cleanFile作為穩定可用的快取，相關邏輯在okhttp3.internal.cache.DiskLruCache$Editor.completeEdit中:

[okhttp3.internal.cache.DiskLruCache$Editor.completeEdit]  
synchronized void completeEdit(Editor editor, boolean success) throws IOException {
    Entry entry = editor.entry;
    if (entry.currentEditor != editor) {
      throw new IllegalStateException();
    }

    // If this edit is creating the entry for the first time, every index must have a value.
    if (success && !entry.readable) {
      for (int i = 0; i < valueCount; i++) {
        if (!editor.written[i]) {
          editor.abort();
          throw new IllegalStateException("Newly created entry didn't create value for index " + i);
        }
        if (!fileSystem.exists(entry.dirtyFiles[i])) {
          editor.abort();
          return;
        }
      }
    }

    for (int i = 0; i < valueCount; i++) {
      File dirty = entry.dirtyFiles[i];
      if (success) {
        if (fileSystem.exists(dirty)) {
          File clean = entry.cleanFiles[i];
          fileSystem.rename(dirty, clean);//將dirtyfile置為cleanfile
          long oldLength = entry.lengths[i];
          long newLength = fileSystem.size(clean);
          entry.lengths[i] = newLength;
          size = size - oldLength + newLength;
        }
      } else {
        fileSystem.delete(dirty);//若失敗則刪除dirtyfile
      }
    }

    redundantOpCount++;
    entry.currentEditor = null;
    //更新日誌
    if (entry.readable | success) {
      entry.readable = true;
      journalWriter.writeUtf8(CLEAN).writeByte(' ');
      journalWriter.writeUtf8(entry.key);
      entry.writeLengths(journalWriter);
      journalWriter.writeByte('\n');
      if (success) {
        entry.sequenceNumber = nextSequenceNumber++;
      }
    } else {
      lruEntries.remove(entry.key);
      journalWriter.writeUtf8(REMOVE).writeByte(' ');
      journalWriter.writeUtf8(entry.key);
      journalWriter.writeByte('\n');
    }
    journalWriter.flush();

    if (size > maxSize || journalRebuildRequired()) {
      executor.execute(cleanupRunnable);
    }
  }

CacheRequestImpl實現CacheRequest介面，向外部類(主要是CacheInterceptor)透出，外部物件通過CacheRequestImpl更新或寫入快取資料。

3.8總結

總結起來DiskLruCache主要有以下幾個特點：

通過LinkedHashMap實現LRU替換
通過本地維護Cache操作日誌保證Cache原子性與可用性，同時為防止日誌過分膨脹定時執行日誌精簡
每一個Cache項對應兩個狀態副本：DIRTY,CLEAN。CLEAN表示當前可用狀態Cache，外部訪問到的cache快照均為CLEAN狀態；DIRTY為更新態Cache。由於更新和建立都只操作DIRTY狀態副本，實現了Cache的讀寫分離
每一個Cache項有四個檔案，兩個狀態（DIRTY,CLEAN）,每個狀態對應兩個檔案：一個檔案儲存Cache meta資料，一個檔案儲存Cache內容資料

OkHttp3.7原始碼分析（四）——快取策略
2017-05-05
HTTP原始碼快取
OkHttp3原始碼分析[快取策略]
2017-06-19
HTTP原始碼快取
OkHttp 原始碼分析（二）—— 快取機制
2019-03-19
HTTP原始碼快取
OkHttp 3.7原始碼分析（五）——連線池
2017-06-19
HTTP原始碼
OkHttp 3.7原始碼分析（一）——整體架構
2017-06-19
HTTP原始碼架構
OkHttp 3.7原始碼分析（三）——任務佇列
2017-06-19
HTTP原始碼佇列
okhttp之旅（十一）--快取策略
2018-05-19
HTTP快取
OkHttp3.7原始碼分析（三）——任務佇列
2017-05-05
HTTP原始碼佇列
OkHttp 知識梳理(4) - OkHttp 之快取原始碼解析
2018-03-26
HTTP快取原始碼
OkHttp 原始碼剖析系列（三）——快取機制
2020-01-03
HTTP原始碼快取
OkHttp原始碼分析
2018-05-10
HTTP原始碼
MyBatis快取原始碼分析
2014-12-13
MyBatis快取原始碼
Mybatis的快取——一級快取和原始碼分析
2020-11-11
MyBatis快取原始碼
OkHttp3.0-原始碼分析
2018-09-01
HTTP原始碼
原始碼分析三：OkHttp—CacheInterceptor
2018-03-12
原始碼HTTP
原始碼分析三：OkHttp—CallServerInterceptor
2018-03-13
原始碼HTTPServer
原始碼分析三：OkHttp—RetryAndFollowUpInterceptor
2018-03-09
原始碼HTTP
原始碼分析筆記——OkHttp
2018-04-02
原始碼筆記HTTP
lodash原始碼分析之List快取
2019-02-21
原始碼快取
lodash原始碼分析之Hash快取
2018-01-02
原始碼快取
OkHttp3.0解析——談談內部的快取策略
2018-11-15
HTTP快取
okhttp 快取實踐
2018-05-16
HTTP快取
mybaits原始碼分析--快取模組（六）
2021-09-03
AI原始碼快取
RecyclerView 原始碼分析（二） —— 快取機制
2021-01-23
View原始碼快取
TMCache原始碼分析(二)---TMDiskCache磁碟快取
2018-05-17
原始碼快取
Okhttp同步請求原始碼分析
2019-01-31
HTTP原始碼
原始碼分析三：OkHttp—BridgeInterceptor
2018-03-12
原始碼HTTP
原始碼分析三：OkHttp—ConnectInterceptor
2018-03-13
原始碼HTTP
OkHttp3原始碼分析[DiskLruCache]
2017-06-19
HTTP原始碼
OkHttp 3.7原始碼分析（二）——攔截器&一個實際網路請求的實現
2017-06-19
HTTP原始碼
mybatis原始碼學習：一級快取和二級快取分析
2020-04-25
MyBatis原始碼快取
Okhttp原始碼閱讀（二）——一個快取是怎麼觸發的
2017-12-13
HTTP原始碼快取
PWA之Workbox快取策略分析
2017-12-07
快取
slab原始碼分析--快取器的建立
2017-01-15
原始碼快取
OkHttp 原始碼分析（一）—— 請求流程
2019-03-12
HTTP原始碼
Okhttp-interceptor原始碼分析，快上車！
2018-06-26
HTTP原始碼
OkHttp3原始碼分析[綜述]
2017-06-19
HTTP原始碼
YYWebImage 原始碼剖析：執行緒處理與快取策略
2019-07-30
Web原始碼執行緒快取