Sikuli測試應用研究報告
最近Sikuli的作者發表了一份研究報告《GUI Testing Using Computer Vision》,在報告中闡述了Sikuli作為GUI測試工具的5個設計目標:
Based on the findings of this interview, we identified the following five design goals to guide the design and development of our new GUI testing tool:
• (G1) The tool should allow testers to write scripts to automate tests.
• (G2) The tool should not require testers to refer GUI components by names or by locations.
• (G3) The tool should minimize the instances when test scripts need to be modified due to design changes.
• (G4) The tool should minimize the effort of writing test scripts.
• (G5) The tool should support good testing practices such as unit testing, regression testing, and test-driven development.
在報告中同時還闡述了Sikuli應用在GUI自動化測試時的的可測性研究和可重用性研究。
表明大部分的GUI控制元件和操作模式都能得到支援。在選取的Capivara、jEdit等軟體作為測試用例可重用性研究表明隨著版本的演進,受到介面設計和互動設計改變的影響,測試用例的可重用性會逐步下降。
在報告的最後,作者也提到Sikuli Test目前存在的兩大主要限制,一個是對於非預期的視覺化反饋的檢測,一個是不能測試GUI的內部功能。因此建議不要把Sikuli作為現有測試工具的替代品,而是一個有益的補充。
However, Sikuli Test currently has two major limitations that can be improved upon in the future. First, while Sikuli Test can assert what visual feedback is expected to appear or to disappear, it is unable to detect unexpected visual feedback. For example, if a programmer accidentally places a random image in a blank area, it is an undetectable error since no one would have anticipated the need to test that area with assertions. One solution would be to run the visual feedback detector at the test time to see if there is any detected visual feedback not covered by an assertion statement. Second, Sikuli Test is designed to test a GUI’s outward visual feedback and is thus unable to test the GUI’s internal functionalities. For example, while Sikuli Test can check if a visual feedback is correctly provided to the user who clicks the save button, it does not know if the file is indeed saved. One solution would be to treat Sikuli Test not as a replacement of but a complement to an existing testing tool. Together they make sure both the outward feedback and inward functionalities of a GUI can be sufficiently tested, a task neither can
accomplish alone.
相關文章
- 即速應用:2020小程式年中研究分析報告
- 軟體效能測試報告應該包含的內容,效能測試報告需要多少錢?測試報告
- 移動應用測試有哪些測試型別?權威的移動app測試報告該如何獲取?型別APP測試報告
- Allure測試報告測試報告
- Jumper 測試報告測試報告
- 雲測試報告測試報告
- 《2019年5G應用場景研究報告》
- 新晴天氣:2020年天氣應用研究報告
- 測試計劃和測試報告測試報告
- 商城網站測試報告應該怎麼寫網站測試報告
- NIST:人臉識別供應商測試報告測試報告
- Flutter試用報告Flutter
- 滲透測試報告測試報告
- 測試總結報告
- 疫情對廣告效果影響多大?我們仔細研究了測試報告……測試報告
- 【區塊鏈】研究報告:2018年中國區塊鏈行業應用報告區塊鏈行業
- pytest-testreport測試報告測試報告
- CNAS軟體測試報告測試報告
- 雲服務測試報告測試報告
- 軟體測試--缺陷報告
- 走進Java介面測試之測試報告ExtentReportJava測試報告
- 為 java 開發者設計的效能測試框架,用於壓測+測試報告生成Java框架測試報告
- 如何測試 Flutter 應用? ー 單元測試Flutter
- 軟體安全測試報告怎麼編寫?安全測試報告價格貴嗎?測試報告
- allure 測試報告怎麼嵌入到測試平臺?測試報告
- allure生成測試報告 0 NAN%測試報告NaN
- 如何編寫功能測試報告測試報告
- 效能測試報告編寫技巧測試報告
- 高顏值測試報告- XTestRunner測試報告
- httprunner(11)執行測試報告HTTP測試報告
- 整合 extentreports、beautifulreport、allure 測試報告測試報告
- 軟體產品測試報告在哪裡申請?出具測試報告時間要多久?測試報告
- 軟體效能測試報告怎麼編寫?哪些機構可以出具效能測試報告測試報告
- 碼住收藏 ▏軟體測試報告應該包含哪些內容?測試報告
- 使用jest測試Koa應用
- 效能測試應用領域
- Android應用程式測試-Alltesting|澤眾雲測試Android
- 軟體驗收測試該怎麼進行?驗收測試報告需要多少費用?測試報告
- 滲透測試學習之報告測試引數五